In response to:

Same-Sex Marriage Thought Police?

Mad Max Wrote: Aug 18, 2012 12:22 PM
A shorter response to the "animals do it too" argument is that animals also eat their young, mate with multiple partners, etc. and therefore provide no insight into how humans should behave. Of course, the danger with this is that some leftist will then propose using aborted fetuses as food and argue for the superiority of collective sex over monogamous marriage, and we'll all be in sensitivity training to accept these wonderful new insights.
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Activists would have us believe that the issue of marriage is about the “rights” and “equality” of homosexuals. But in reality, the push to redefine marriage is about demanding public approval and celebration of homosexuality. There is a difference. Slot machines are legal in some areas, but if the COO of Chick-fil-a had expressed a personal disapproval of gambling, would slot-machine supporters have demanded a boycott of his restaurants? What about smokers? Would they have lambasted Dan Cathy for expressing that he personally does not approve of smoking?

No. Because at the end...