In response to:

Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

Mad Max Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 10:20 AM
Nice way to dodge the undeniable facts that there were more registered voters than eligible voters in numerous places and that Obama won by Saddam Hussein-like margins in various precincts. If you don't sense fraud there, you are incredibly naive.
anonymousse971 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 3:35 PM
DHE,
Your Communist ideology is neither new or wanted on this site. I know you are worried that you will be caught for voter fraud and it has very high penalties but trolling a conservative website will not save you.
LAPhil Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 10:42 AM
That's "great", not "gread". (There I go again).
LAPhil Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 10:42 AM
That was addressed to DHE, which is hard to figure out from the positions of these posts. Gread post, by the way, DHE.
LAPhil Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 10:40 AM
Exactly. After a while this gets to be like blaming the refs for a loss when your team just failed to play well enough to win a decisive victory. You can do that forever, but it's not very productive.

There were many factors that hurt Mitt Romney and favored Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election. The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800's. The left wing media predictably did everything it could to perpetuate that false caricature. Obama's race was an advantage; voters of all persuasions, particularly minorities, still cannot get over the allure of the first black president. The 47% of Americans on welfare were predisposed to vote for the food stamp president over Romney, wanting the free goodies to keep...