Scalia’s dissent, at least on first quick perusal, reads like it was originally written as a majority opinion http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/2012/06/evidence-that-the-votes-shifted-after-conference-initial-vote-to-declare-mandate-unconstitutional.html (in particular, he consistently refers to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion as “The Dissent”). Back in May, there were rumors floating around relevant legal circles that a key vote was taking place, and that Roberts was feeling tremendous pressure from unidentified circles to vote to uphold the...
In response to:
The court has a history of saying "Hey voters -- you asked for this, you fix it." This opinion is simply the court's way of saying "If you don't like taxes, don't vote for politicians who raise your taxes." Roberts drew a very clear line. He said the federal government has the power to tax any group of people it wants in order to incentivize them one way or another. Ok... so now our quest is clear... if we don't like this power of government, we have to limit (re-limit) government via a constitutional amendment.
- WH: Obama will totally be an asset for Democrats this year Guy Benson 11 minutes ago
- Russia and others: testing the limits? Bruce McQuain 51 minutes ago
- Open thread: Obama to speak on Ukraine after imposing sanctions Ed Morrissey 1 hour ago
- National Journal: Hillary resets on Russia Ed Morrissey 2 hours ago
- US to give up control over Internet Ed Morrissey 2 hours ago
- Flight 370 dropped to 5,000 feet to evade radar Ed Morrissey 3 hours ago