In response to:

The Decline and Fall of America

MacQ - Texas Wrote: Nov 17, 2012 12:58 PM
Newsflash for W-SMITH: You don't need job "growth" when you're at full employment (like we were after the Bush Tax Cuts). To compare "job growth" numbers between full employment situations and high unemployment situations is either ignorant or dishonest. Which were you being? Or perhaps you just didn't think about it?
w-smith-84 Wrote: Nov 17, 2012 1:47 PM
Spin much, MacQ?

So Bush's NET job number is NEGATIVE! Are you saying the population declined during Bush's tenure?

Of course your not. NEWSFLASH, you don't need to spin if you aren't a hard-core partisan.

And, of course, you're IGNORING my main point - that there is NO CAUSAL LINK between tax rates and job creation.

http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/18/news/economy/obama-bush-jobs/index.html

(Don't call CNN liberal - post a link to your REFUTATION of the data). You won't, you can't!

A few days after the election of 2012 the very talented Michael Ramirez published a political cartoon that perhaps conveyed a more profound meaning than he anticipated. He depicted a pair of hands extending from star-studded sleeves (presumably from a mendicant Uncle Sam), which were held in supplication, as though waiting for a handout or petitioning voters to relinquish more of their earnings to the federal government. There’s another way of interpreting this image, however; the hands appeared not only pathetic and a bit contemptible, but also aged and withered, as though belonging to an old man. In which case,...