In response to:

Separation of Church and Home

Mac300 Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 2:05 PM
I think the point is that, BECAUSE the private complex accepts public funds, it cannot interfere with free speech or religion. Otherwise, it could probably make its own rules. Mac Smith
In a new low by those suffering from the belief that all things religious are like asbestos in the ceiling tiles of society, a senior living complex has denied an elderly widow the freedom to pray and talk about her faith in a common area. Why? Because the complex accepts U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development funds.

This is a wrongheaded view of “separation of church and state” on steroids. The Constitution does not create a separation of church and home.

The left has long sought to remove religions—and especially Judeo-Christian religions—from any location outside of church.

...

Tuesday, May 21 | 11:53 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 11:53 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 11:53 PM ET
Tuesday, May 21 | 11:53 PM ET