Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Doubling Down on Anti-Gun News

M1946W Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 9:20 AM
They don't. They blame it on the places that don't have their enlightened attitude causing their streets to be flooded with illegals guns.
In response to:

Doubling Down on Anti-Gun News

M1946W Wrote: Feb 08, 2013 9:16 AM
One might pause to question 'the "news" manufacturers aren't hoping for a school shooting'. What continues to be overlooked is the real role of the gun. Rather than having as its only reason for being to kill the real role of the gun is to act as a deterrent to those who would do us harm. When that deterrent factor is missing as it is in areas with strict gun control violence escalates. The crowning achievement of the anti-gun crowd is the gun free zone which they've managed to institute in our schools. Are these people really that stupid or is it they don't mind sacrificing a few more children on the altar of Progressivism if they can exploit the tragedy? Hint: this is the same crowd claiming abortion as a right.
That seems in the cards, alright. I recall reading warnings that since government intervention stopped the consolidation and contraction phases of the business cycle in 2008 we would simply have continued whipsawing of increasing frequency and severity. Judging from the rate of insider selling it may be sooner rather than later.
I think the privitization of profit and the socialization of risk is a better fit. Easy credit, sure, but that seems just a way of extracting money from the unwashed masses. Plus the government isn't covering everyone's behind, just the politically influencial, the crony capitalists.
In response to:

Robot Wars in China

M1946W Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 8:20 AM
Two words spring to mind: 'war' and 'deflation'.
I was guessing UNION THUG but they do share many attrubutes.
In response to:

Obama and Gun Control

M1946W Wrote: Feb 04, 2013 10:01 AM
No, the discussion isn't taking place. It was never meant to take place. If it were some embarrassing questions might be raised. For instance if even the most fervent anti-gunner would refuse to put a sign on their door proudly proclaiming their home to be gun-free why do they demand our schools be turned into magnets for lunatic mass-murderers by having them designated gun-free zones? Are they that stupid or is it they don't mind having a few more children sacrificed on the altar of Progressivism so they can exploit the tragedy? Hint: this is the same crowd that thinks killing 1.2 million unborn each year is a human right.
We should be cleaning house but it isn't going to happen. Both Fannie and Freddie have both been an oasis in the desert for Democrats for decades and they've milked it for everything they could get (and that was a lot.) For those doubters try reading Morgensen and Rosner's "Reckless Endangerment" to see how the system worked in the past, continues to work now, and will continue to work in the future.
In response to:

Where Will You Go if America Collapses?

M1946W Wrote: Feb 04, 2013 8:37 AM
Collapse or no I'm in favor of the part of the country that still wants the old, moldy Constitution with it's Bill of Rights and limited government to split off from the new, hip, living Constitution part that gives us our rights and then changes or takes them away at its whim. That's really what we have, a new civil war between two competing philosophies. Let the Progressives go their own way and check on them every 20 years or so to see if anyone is left alive.
Actually some American politicians DO have the same evil motives, Dan. Liberals won't post a sign proudly proclaiming their homes to be gun-free. They know it's stupid and a dangerous invitation to hardened criminals. However they are quite willing to turn our schools into magnets for lunatic mass-murderers. So are they really that stupid or is it they don't mind having a few more children sacrificed on the altar of Progressivism so they can exploit the tragedy to achieve their agenda? Hint: this is the same crowd that thinks killing 1.2 million unborn each year is a basic human right.
In response to:

Shouting Louder

M1946W Wrote: Jan 29, 2013 9:14 AM
The difference is Hillary should now be on trial for perjury. I guess she knows a lot about lying under oath having seen her husband's performances. Note how quickly the Obama regime rolled out the video as the reason. It's almost like they had it prepared in case something went wrong. And what could possibly go wrong? That the whole kidnapping was a hoax perpetrated most likely by the CIA in order to make Obama look good and shore up his sagging re-election poll numbers by negotiating an exchange, Stevens for Omar Abdel-Rahman, the Blind Sheikh, But it went fubar when the Seals disobeyed the order to stand-down and the terrorists, thinking they’d been betrayed by Obama, raped and tortured Stevens leading to later death.
Previous 11 - 20 Next
Saturday, May 25 | 11:26 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 11:26 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 11:26 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 11:26 AM ET