1 - 10 Next
"http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2952709/posts" You apparently don't know what real evidence is. Try following the links to the "source" and see where you get.
Yeah, right, "wiseone" Perhaps you could provide the evidence for the "$40 million estate in Hawaii" ? I doubt I'll hear from Ransom.
"do you REALLY think Comrade Hussein is going to make the purchase in his own name?" Right, that's why the "article" makes references to the Obama's, "Reports out of Washington are that Barack and Michelle are counting on a loss in November and are anxious to return to Hawaii to start their new life. “They want the kids to attend high school in Hawaii, and they want to be as far away from Washington as possible,” said a source in the White House." Gullible, much?
So, Ransom, could you or anyone provide independent evidence for this? For example a transaction like this would certainly be in the WSJ? Or perhaps you could do a search on the real estate section of the magazine that first featured this property http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Honolulu-Magazine/Real-Estate/. Something other than an online blog? Or, you could admit that you were too lazy to actually verify this rumor.
"Hey, the Obamas are buying a $40 million estate in Hawaii with the help of billionaire heiress Penny Pritzker.." Ransom responds "Yes, I understand that the Obamas won’t be calling Chicago home anymore." Really? You buy this? If you did any research you keep coming to: http://weeklyworldnews.com/politics/51125/obama-buys-40-million-estate-in-hawaii/www.Hillbuzz.org Which is a dead link. The "estate" is/was up for sale http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Honolulu-Magazine/Real-Estate/July-2011/As-seen-on-Hawaii-Five-0-Fantastic-Kailua-estate/ But there is no record to back up the silly statements that the Obama's bought it.
"BTW Give me a link to the above quote..." Wait, didn't you just tell me "So typical of a libturd to seek out someone else to do their work for them. LOL!!"
Ransom is certainly selective in his quotes. Did the Govt have a say in the disposition of Chrysler? I hope so, it was our money (given by G. Bush) being used to keep them from going under. That said, the choice (Hobson's?) was up to Chrysler management, not the Govt. But to the larger point, Ransom's entire piece as about the truthfulness of the claim of shipping jobs overseas. Here is what Romney said "I saw a story today that one of the great manufacturers in this state Jeep — now owned by the Italians — is thinking of moving all production to China," The piece Ransom cites shows that this was a lie. I noticed he didn't dispute that.
"Obama this week has been suggesting Americans would be driving Chinese-made vehicles if Romney's opposition to the bailout had prevailed." I'll spare the invective, here is the whole quote "If Mitt Romney had been president when the auto industry was on the verge of collapse, we might not have an American auto industry today. We'd be buying cars from China, instead of selling cars to China." We would not be buying cars from China but would GM and Chrysler survived for us to buy cars from them?
Yes, a heckler dissing energy/climate policy. Conservatives would never do that... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4a4-8TU93g or would they? Interesting, this person was allowed to stay.
In response to Romney's statment Chrysler was more explicit: "Let's set the record straight: Jeep has no intention of shifting production of its Jeep models out of North America to China. It's simply reviewing the opportunities to return Jeep output to China for the world's largest auto market. U.S. Jeep assembly lines will continue to stay in operation." http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20121026/POLITICS01/210260402#ixzz2B4LT8bKg
1 - 10 Next