In response to:

Our Real Manmade Climate Crisis

M.Hillinger__aka__QR Wrote: Mar 04, 2013 3:52 PM
"Seems to me that if the AGW crowd really believed in AGW, they would've invested those billions in fusion research, and had a working fusion power plant by now" Right, the only thing that is preventing fusion from becoming a reality is lack of funding.
OneForFreedom Wrote: Mar 04, 2013 5:35 PM
Perhaps you should check out some of the non-standard fusion machines people are researching. Way back in the '90's I was told that a linear machine could be built that would work - problem is it would be a kilometer long, and the second entity to build a machine would use all that was sunk into the first one to advantage.

ITER is supposed to reach engineering break-even, and is still a research machine. I maintain that if AGW were being taken seriously, there would be a LOT more efforts in fusion, as well as a move towards fission power.

For an interesting concept, check

In his first address as Secretary of State, John Kerry said we must safeguard “the most sacred trust” we owe to our children and grandchildren: “an environment not ravaged by rising seas, deadly superstorms, devastating droughts, and the other hallmarks of a dramatically changing climate.”

Even the IPCC and British Meteorological Office now recognize that average global temperatures haven’t budged in almost 17 years. No evidence suggests that sea level rise, storms, droughts or other weather and climate events or trends display any statistically significant difference from what Earth and mankind have experienced over the last 100-plus...