In response to:

When I Want a Progressive’s Opinion on What Guns I Should Have/Hunt with, I’ll Give it to Them

LYNN263 Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 2:38 PM
If the First Amendment to the Constitution of the US covers CIVIL RIGHTS, then it seems to me that the Second Amendment does the very same thing. Second Amendment rights ARE Civil Rights.
Luscious Lars Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 6:54 PM
Yes, LYNN263, you are correct. We need to avoid getting bogged down in the progressives argument about why we need any particular type of weapon for hunting. If we start our rebuttal by saying, "lots of people hunt with AR15's, AK47's, etc." we are playing right into the progressives hands. When someone states, "no one needs an assault weapon to hunt with", or "no one needs 10 bullets to hunt deer", we need to come back with 4 words, uttered with strength and conviction in our voices. "It's not about hunting". Then follow up with, "It's about freedom". Freedom covers civil rights. Civil rights are all components of the larger issue, which is freedom, or liberty, whichever we choose to call it. The 2nd Amendment is one of the KEY components.
Phineas T. Bluster Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 8:23 PM
If NEED ever matters, who needs 2 cars, 2 teeves.... I could go on....
My buddy, Green Beret badass Bryan Sikes, shot a massive whitetail buck last week during our South Texas Purple Heart Adventure. He whacked said muy grande with a LaRue Tactical OBR chambered for the glorious .308 Win. round. Oh and BTW, Sikes used a high capacity magazine during this hunt.

For those of you who aren’t hip to the LaRue, it is a weapon that progressive darlings say we should not have because we don’t “need” such a weapon for hunting.

Hunting, according to these wizards of odd, is what they think our founding fathers had in mind when...

Related Tags: Guns Hunting Hunting Rights