In response to:

When I Want a Progressive’s Opinion on What Guns I Should Have/Hunt with, I’ll Give it to Them

Luscious Lars Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 11:36 AM
I understand your point that we don't want government folks to have more rights than us common folk do, and I support that. However, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER agree to any unconstitutional laws for ANYONE. The common folk will suffer as we don't have the financial resources to fight the government over legal issues. The government won't take on themselves. Corruption and bribes are much more common in the government agencies than we will ever know. Former New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin was just caught, but he's no longer part of government. Isn't it funny that no one knew about his corruption while he was IN government? Don't ever give in or surrender on your rights. In the end, you can't really trust government 100%.
My buddy, Green Beret badass Bryan Sikes, shot a massive whitetail buck last week during our South Texas Purple Heart Adventure. He whacked said muy grande with a LaRue Tactical OBR chambered for the glorious .308 Win. round. Oh and BTW, Sikes used a high capacity magazine during this hunt.

For those of you who aren’t hip to the LaRue, it is a weapon that progressive darlings say we should not have because we don’t “need” such a weapon for hunting.

Hunting, according to these wizards of odd, is what they think our founding fathers had in mind when...

Related Tags: Guns Hunting Hunting Rights