In response to:

Guns Save Lives

Luscious Lars Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 9:13 AM
And public schools will not allow the NRA's Eddie Eagle Gun Safety program for children to be implemented. All it teaches is what to do if a young person happens upon a gun. It doesn't teach shooting or politics. But liberals will have nothing to do with it. They even made the ridiculous comparison between Eddie Eagle and Joe Camel. Liberals are full of baby puup. They won't grow up and be responsible. They just want a big government to protect them and pass stupid laws to make liberals "feel" safer. Idiots they are, those liberals. That means you Allison. If you're brains were gasoline, you couldn't power an ants go-kart once around the inside of a fruit loop.
Luscious Lars Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 9:42 AM
How do you know, stupid? What if your kid happened to be over at a gang members house and found one of the guns? Would you're kid know what to do? We have 100 million gun owners. The chances of a child coming across a gun on some occasion are real. Best teach them how do deal with it. Do you teach your kids what to do if they come across a bottle of bleach or a book of matches? Or won't your kids ever have access to any of those items either.
DontEatMyDog Wrote: Apr 02, 2013 9:31 AM
Yeah, so far they get ripped apart and flushed down a toilet.

We all know that guns can cost lives because the media repeat this message endlessly, as if we could not figure it out for ourselves. But even someone who reads newspapers regularly and watches numerous television newscasts may never learn that guns also save lives-- much less see any hard facts comparing how many lives are lost and how many are saved.

But that trade-off is the real issue, not the Second Amendment or the National Rifle Association, which so many in the media obsess about. If guns cost more lives than they save, we can always repeal the Second...