In response to:

An Ideological Test for Gun Ownership: The Next Logical Step in the Effort to Keep Dangerous People From Buying Firearms

Luny Tune Wrote: Aug 08, 2012 8:15 AM
And maybe we should block those Napalitano says are threats to the government. You know, those who want limited government, deregulations. Let's throw in the Christians. They are certainly radical. And those constitutionalists. They are very dangerous. Jacob Sullum, I do believe you are a communist. Are you sure you're not a card carrying Brady Fan?
The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence says Sunday's deadly attack on a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, a Milwaukee suburb, shows "our elected officials" need to "do something." Slightly more specifically, the group says we should "Demand Congress Stop Arming Dangerous People."

I did not realize there was a federal program that supplies mass murderers with weapons. Obviously, this is a poor use of our tax dollars. Congress should not only eliminate this program but it should also prevent dangerous people from buying guns on their own.

But how do we know who is dangerous? The Brady Campaign mentions "convicted felons," "convicted...