In response to:

The Fallacy of Redistribution

LuckyLarue Wrote: Sep 20, 2012 1:33 PM
Look, lemmi, you can't just define "redistribution of wealth" to mean only those programs you are against. Well, you *can*, but nobody will take you seriously. If paying a soldier's salary or buying their guns and fighter jets (or building schools and roads, etc.al) *isn't* redistribution of wealth, then what is it? It sure feels like the government is taking my money and giving it to other people every April with I write them a check.
The recently discovered tape on which Barack Obama said back in 1998 that he believes in redistribution is not really news. He said the same thing to Joe the Plumber four years ago. But the surfacing of this tape may serve a useful purpose if it gets people to thinking about what the consequences of redistribution are.

Those who talk glibly about redistribution often act as if people are just inert objects that can be placed here and there, like pieces on a chess board, to carry out some grand design. But if human beings have their own responses to government policies,...