In response to:

Cultural Deviancy, Not Guns

Loyal Democrat Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 7:12 AM
Williams' misses the point. The idea is to test whether or not the 2nd Amendment will be allowed to stand. If the govt can make a case for the infringement of any portion of the right to bear arms, they will have set a precedent that acknowledges the authority of govt officials to restrict or eliminate portions of the Bill of Rights. For far too long the populace had been under the idiotic assumption that The Bill details rights that the govt was not granted any power to control. The fact is, the govt has the right to take away any of those rights whenever it feels such action is necessary. If the populace abuses the rights granted to them by the ruling class, the rulers have the right to restrict or withdraw those rights.
Rich D. Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 10:43 AM
Another tired, stupid attempt at satire by our resident "humorist". Give it up and post something meaningful sometime. You're not even clever enough to be subtle.
Beethovens10th Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 10:48 AM
There is wisdom that sometimes can't be fully conveyed without sarcasm.
Tinsldr2 Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 1:00 PM
I think LD is hilarious and seek out his posts

The way his satire pokes fun of the libs and the responses it generates are great

If there was a conservative version of SNL i would want him to write for them
Phillep Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 3:45 PM
Satirizing Leftoids calls for a very large club. Otherwise the leftoids all pile in and agree.

Note Leo Gustave and Mike Pants.
Ms Kelly Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 5:40 PM
You MUST be a lib or you would enjoy the humor. What's the matter? Does she make you feel a little stupid when she speaks the truth.
tibby2 Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 8:20 AM
Good one, L.D.

an opening into the collectivist mind. keep up the good work.
Doug5049 Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 8:58 AM
Rich D. Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 10:44 AM
Do you know how Jesus condemned those who cause others to stumble?
Kevin 354 Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 7:49 AM
If the people consent to obey an administrative policy, that is voluntary on the part of the people. The law, void of Constitutional Amendment, still stands. "Shall not be infringed" means shall not be infringed. If the people don't insist on the body of government to obey the Constitution, the Body can do everything it pleases, but by consent, and this leads to stacks and stacks of a administrative law which can be mixed, combined, and arbitrarily imposed at the whim of the Executive and the mood of the people as measured by the Supreme Court. The Second Amendment isn't being challenged, the people are being challenged to voluntarily obey, yet one more administrative law which contradicts their constitutional rights.
Ms Kelly Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 5:38 PM
It's already infringed. We have the right to "Keep" and "Bear" arms. To "bear" means to carry on your person. You can't carry a gun today unless you have a permit from Big Brother.
David1104 Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 7:48 AM
2nd Amendment to the US Constitution:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

I don't know in what Bizarro world you live but when I read the 2nd Amendment it is pretty clear that our Founders didn't want the government to be able to restrict guns in any way, shape or form. Just because you disagree with this right does not mean you get to remove it from the Bill of Rights.
evie10 Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 4:13 PM
Dennis1832 Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 7:30 AM
Rulers? You consider politicians rulers. So what does that make you, a serf? At least that explains your attitude of wanting to be controlled by someone else. Enlightening even if it is quit pathetic.
evie10 Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 4:13 PM

There's a story told about a Paris chief of police who was called to a department store to stop a burglary in progress. Upon his arrival, he reconnoitered the situation and ordered his men to surround the entrances of the building next door. When questioned about his actions, he replied that he didn't have enough men to cover the department store's many entrances but he did have enough for the building next door. Let's see whether there are similarities between his strategy and today's gun control strategy.

Last year, Chicago had 512 homicides; Detroit had 411; Philadelphia had 331; and Baltimore...