Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Ferguson, the Verdict is….

LouisianaMan225 Wrote: Nov 16, 2014 10:10 AM
Talk about jury tampering, huh? "If you find No True Bill, there WILL be violent riots across the country and there WILL be plenty of 'White Girl bleed a lot' incidents. Ferguson will burn, 'hoods across the country may burn, and lots of Asian shopkeepers will be abandoned to fight for their lives and property against black mobs. The DOJ WILL investigate everything that every grand juror has ever said and done, and will publicize names, chapter & verse of anything you may have done wrong in your life. The President of the United States WILL say that your grand jury deliberations were stupid, ill-advised, and/or tainted by latent institutional racism. Now...are you SURE you don't want to look at that evidence a little harder to see if there's any possible way you can justify finding a True Bill? That'll kick the can down the road a ways and put the pressure on 12 jurors, none of whom are YOU.
The rioting we have been all but promised in Ferguson will also provide tinder to light the fire of racial rioting elsewhere. There will be massive tension, threats of "No justice, no peace!"; Sharpton & Jackson (and Obama) stirring the pot; and a desperate attempt by racial partisans to expose every false move, every angry word, every ugly look, by the Ferguson police. And if evidence is lacking, they'll fabricate it. The MSM will be a major factor in assisting the coming violence, as it will increase their viewership and notoriety, and consequences be damned. Ferguson will be a mess--we've been promised that already. Look for lots of "White Girl Bleed a Lot" episodes across the country & tons of material for Colin Flaherty's blog of that name. I am thoroughly sick of our country endlessly repeating this same kabuki dance.
In response to:

Where Was President Obama?

LouisianaMan225 Wrote: Oct 25, 2014 9:28 AM
What does "SFR" mean, anyway? "Socialist Federal Republic"? You sound like a communist hack, and always do. As much as your puerile rhetoric gags me, I'll still be fit to get to the voting booth...and also fit to fight for our country and our Constitution. You communists have gotten away with a lot...a LOT. But don't imagine we won't take care of business if you EVER make the mistake of attempting the violent overthrow of our Republic.
And policy wonk fools still scratch their heads about the disconnect between regular Americans and the cesspool that is Washington D.C. Trying to pretend that thugs and drug dealers are a CDC issue is patently fraudulent & a criminal misuse of taxpayers' money. It's also a patently obvious attempt to use the Vaunted Federal Bureaucracy to achieve sleazy, under-the-table gun control unattainable by Constitutional means.
I take the ISIS threats seriously, although they & their ilk certainly do more talking than acting in many cases. If they come my way, I just hope I get a fighting chance--which of course is NOT what they are trying to accomplish--in which case I will "get some." I hope to stick around a while yet, but can think of worse ways to go than stacking ISIS bodies on my way out. A lot of fanatics & assorted dirtbags have made the same mistake before ISIS, in thinking that Americans and American military personnel are averse to mixing it up. :-) True, we generally prefer to do more pleasant & worthwhile things, but once we're convinced that somebody's a$$ just has to get whipped, oh well.... ISIS could read some history to figure out all that, but if they had all that paper to spare, I guess they wouldn't be using their left hands and a scoop of sand to wipe themselves, right? Savages with one foot in hell already.
Agreed. I was cringing at the multitude of errors.
In response to:

Welcome to Public Relations 101

LouisianaMan225 Wrote: Aug 23, 2014 9:57 AM
that's "insult to injury," of course....
In response to:

Welcome to Public Relations 101

LouisianaMan225 Wrote: Aug 23, 2014 9:56 AM
Go get 'em, Mike! Bravo! Your response to their clumsily-executed PR ambush was in accordance with classic US Army doctrine for "Respond to a Near Ambush." Since you were engaged by them at close range in an engagement area (kill zone) of their own choosing, you would have been (1) shot to pieces if you'd simply dropped to the ground and returned fire, and (2) shot in the back if you'd tried to run away, thereby "dying tired" and adding insult to energy. Instead, you turned into the source of the fire and assaulted it at high speed and with maximum firepower. Very dangerous proposition of course, especially against an ambush carefully prepared by a tough, seasoned enemy, but at least there's a chance that you can seize the initiative & turn the tables, making them more interested in breaking contact (aka "hauling a$$") than in reloading and pouring a massive volume of fire into you as you wriggle around in their kill zone. Against a less capable opponent such as Bryan College's PR firm, your immediate action counterambush drill instantly and totally regained the initiative, paralyzed them with surprise and fear as they immediately became the prey, rather than the predator. Maybe a chastened, shocked few escaped to fight another day, but now they're more worried about what you'll do to them, rather than what they'll do to you. They belatedly realize that they have just paid a shocking price for their cultural illiteracy. Anybody who has read your work over the years, as I have, recognizes that your response was simply SOP for Dr. Mike, but those lightweights never realized they were ditty-bopping into a heavyweight bout, to change the metaphor. Too bad they took a wrong turn coming out of their gender-immaterial locker room. It's a lick on 'em! Dr. Mike, you're an inspiration to the rest of us out here in the hinterlands, as we do sentry takedowns against the gender-confused progs, addled by their witches' brew of mindless PC slogans and unexamined beliefs. Again: thanks for your leadership by example!
In response to:

Meet the Cops Who Gave Their Lives

LouisianaMan225 Wrote: Aug 15, 2014 12:11 PM
Right, You're RIGHT! These things play out in such a farcical manner that I'd laugh if I weren't crying (for my dying country)
People who don't wish to pray at a public event don't have to, but they can have enough class to wait respectfully while others do. When did common sense become so damned hard? Now Islam is a bit of a sticky wicket. It is an undeniable article of that faith to subjugate non-Muslim monotheists, and eradicate polytheists. So, I don't intend to listen to them broadcasting their prayers in a foreign language in my country, knowing that they are liable to be calling for the destruction of my culture & country. I would likewise have a problem with Christians or Jews giving some double-barreled prayer at a public event, calling for the eradication of non-believers, etc. On the other hand, I would have no problem with anybody's peaceful prayers. If two Jewish private schools played a football game, I'd behave respectfully if they offered a Jewish prayer. If some school or schools had a very large contingent of Muslim students, I wouldn't mind if they had a prayer before the game, and I'd behave respectfully as they did so. Since this country was founded within a Judaeo-Christian culture, however, I'd expect any public Muslim prayer to be non-hostile to this country's long traditions. And if some schools started having prayers by every-damn-body who wanted to howl at the moon in the name of religious freedom, I wouldn't attend the game. Anybody who doesn't understand what the Constitution says in prohibiting Congress from establishing any religion, is either an ignoramus or they're being deliberately obtuse. Anybody who knows any history should understand perfectly well what is meant by an "established religion," and some coaches praying with players simply bears no resemblance whatsoever to that. I'm a bare-bones Christian who believes in God, prays for his guidance, but does little else with religion, but the militant atheists are utterly corrosive and irritate the hell out of me. They have no business trying to abolish the practice of religion, and they're utterly blind to the irony that they themselves are practicing a faith: disbelief in God. This stuff should be pretty simple, but the idiots who tried to overthrow American culture in the 1960's have poisoned the well so badly that I can hardly drink the water here anymore. I pray for sanity to return to my country, and keep my powder dry.
Previous 11 - 20 Next