Many keen political observers have noticed the complete lack of a serious jobs plan, let alone an open and honest discussion about ways his administration can spur economic growth, in the president’s second inaugural address. In many respects, this comes as no surprise: the president ran a maliciously negative and unserious campaign that sought to destroy his political opponent at all costs. And it worked. But with another recession possibly on the horizon, shouldn’t this issue have been substantively addressed at some point during his somewhat lengthy remarks? The Wall Street Journal’s Stephen Moore addressed this question in a...
Granted, I cannot listen to the One's voice because I truly have a physical reaction. I have found that most of his agenda formalized into bumper sticker style talking points - are hardly worth my time. Same marxist racist cr@pola, different day. When I read what he spouted in his inagural address, the first and foremost reaction to every whine was JOBS. Primarily - Help the poor by getting out of the way of private industry and laying the groundwork for a robust economy that creates jobs. As long as receiving a government check pays more than a job, we are scrwd - the taxpayer that is.
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 10 hours ago
- WMD in Iraq a rather nuanced issue Ed Morrissey 12 hours ago
- Perry: Rand Paul’s position on Iraq is “disheartening … curiously blind” Ed Morrissey 13 hours ago
- Joni Ernst will miss two weeks on the campaign trail… to serve in uniform Jazz Shaw 15 hours ago
- UN Security Council issues non-binding call for cease fire in Gaza Ed Morrissey 16 hours ago
- UAW decides to skip election and form union at VW anyway Jazz Shaw 18 hours ago