Many keen political observers have noticed the complete lack of a serious jobs plan, let alone an open and honest discussion about ways his administration can spur economic growth, in the president’s second inaugural address. In many respects, this comes as no surprise: the president ran a maliciously negative and unserious campaign that sought to destroy his political opponent at all costs. And it worked. But with another recession possibly on the horizon, shouldn’t this issue have been substantively addressed at some point during his somewhat lengthy remarks? The Wall Street Journal’s Stephen Moore addressed this question in a...
Granted, I cannot listen to the One's voice because I truly have a physical reaction. I have found that most of his agenda formalized into bumper sticker style talking points - are hardly worth my time. Same marxist racist cr@pola, different day. When I read what he spouted in his inagural address, the first and foremost reaction to every whine was JOBS. Primarily - Help the poor by getting out of the way of private industry and laying the groundwork for a robust economy that creates jobs. As long as receiving a government check pays more than a job, we are scrwd - the taxpayer that is.
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 2 hours ago
- Sotloff “fixer”: Americans never contacted me after his abduction Ed Morrissey 3 hours ago
- David Cameron to Scotland: Baby, don’t go. Mary Katharine Ham 3 hours ago
- Confirmed: You can tell someone’s politics by their body odor Allahpundit 4 hours ago
- Oh my: I think Romney’s going to run, says top Wall Street backer Allahpundit 5 hours ago
- Election forecasters bearish on GOP? Senate models looking more Democratic by the day Noah Rothman 6 hours ago