In response to:

Moore: Yeah, Obama “Didn’t Talk About Jobs” in his Second Inaugural

lonewolfswift Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:26 PM
Granted, I cannot listen to the One's voice because I truly have a physical reaction. I have found that most of his agenda formalized into bumper sticker style talking points - are hardly worth my time. Same marxist racist cr@pola, different day. When I read what he spouted in his inagural address, the first and foremost reaction to every whine was JOBS. Primarily - Help the poor by getting out of the way of private industry and laying the groundwork for a robust economy that creates jobs. As long as receiving a government check pays more than a job, we are scrwd - the taxpayer that is.
DagNabbit Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:39 PM
"Granted, I cannot listen to the One's voice because I truly have a physical reaction"

... You get a hardon?
Keep the change Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:46 PM
oh you addicts are uproariously funny- to yourselves.

Release the tourniquet now and breathe
Chestertonfan Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:35 PM
For you, the voice, for me it's the raised, angled chin a la Mussolini that triggers the physical reaction. Of course that chin in the air pose usually precedes a ridiculous strawman argument or an outright lie. Therefore our physical reactions are only seconds apart.
DagNabbit Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:41 PM
I know EXACTLY what you mean. The Chimpy Bush Smirk (CBS) (TM) did that for me. Fortunately, the Chimpster is out of my life for good. The future is OUR time, Morpheus.
katepatate Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 7:49 PM
A pox on you and all who voted this evil one back into office.
MudontheTires Wrote: Jan 22, 2013 10:51 PM
"The future is OUR time, Morpheus."

Your "future" has already occured. See the history of the USSR for details.

Many keen political observers have noticed the complete lack of a serious jobs plan, let alone an open and honest discussion about ways his administration can spur economic growth, in the president’s second inaugural address. In many respects, this comes as no surprise: the president ran a maliciously negative and unserious campaign that sought to destroy his political opponent at all costs. And it worked. But with another recession possibly on the horizon, shouldn’t this issue have been substantively addressed at some point during his somewhat lengthy remarks? The Wall Street Journal’s Stephen Moore addressed this question in a...