In response to:

NUCLEAR: Harry Reid, Senate Dems Trash Precedent, Change Filibuster Rules

loisonumbers Wrote: Nov 21, 2013 12:43 PM
Good. Republicans shouldn't just be allowed to put everything on hold until they're back in control. Elections have consequences.
JamesB2 Wrote: Nov 21, 2013 1:55 PM
Be careful what you wish for. If the dems lose the senate next year, Reid will regret not having a filibuster at his disposal. Like Obamacare, this will blow up in their faces.
scrow Wrote: Nov 21, 2013 1:29 PM
Then why is Reid changing the rules to avoid the consequences of the Republican senators that were elected?
scrow Wrote: Nov 21, 2013 1:28 PM
You don't seem to have a problem with the Democrats doing it, by introducing the rule in the first place.
ithomas Wrote: Nov 21, 2013 1:16 PM
Typical liberal stance. If you can't play by the 225 year old rules, change them.
skywalker58 Wrote: Nov 21, 2013 1:03 PM
Ok, sweetie, what are you going to say about it when Republicans do get control of the Senate back? Will you want the rules changed back so Democrats can filibuster? You can't have it both ways you hypocrit. So predictable and so ignorant.
Rick2477 Wrote: Nov 21, 2013 12:54 PM
Yeah. And there's that word; 'consequences'. Liberals hate that word, right? 'Consequences' everywhere these days for the One and his acolytes. But no one steps forward and takes ownership of any of these 'consequences'; Obama's '...that's on me...' notwithstanding cause it's not really on him, is it. Cause he's -black, and protected. Consequences; I like the sound of that word.
1375 Wrote: Nov 21, 2013 12:53 PM
SEVERE consequences whern Demonrats are elected.
JarheadRVN70 Wrote: Nov 21, 2013 12:49 PM
Rules are rules, jack wad.