In response to:

Why it’s Romney and Not Very Close

loadstar Wrote: Nov 06, 2012 12:25 PM
Uh-oh, apparently yet more paid gadfly libbie, troll spam posters-- just ignore their white noise/swamp gas They are just here to irritate/play the gadfly: The Slaondog stay_focused other iterations: JamesMadison fidelcastro UmayNotAgree PopWarner pzaqwer redtie hisLOINS Petya akagi021 Scrappedlron friley
Ross83 Wrote: Nov 06, 2012 1:01 PM
Torr Wrote: Nov 06, 2012 12:36 PM
Right On loadstar!

These nescient fools represent America's liberal/progressive statist's, who know they can't win arguments or elections based on pertinent factual data, or on the merits of their arguments. So, their purpose is to flood conservative blogs with liberal lies in an attempt to dispirit conservative voters. That's why there has been such a spate of them in the last several days.

If you want joyful relief from their profound stupidity, just resolve to VOTE today, and smile at the continued ignorance of these nescient trolls.
loadstar Wrote: Nov 06, 2012 1:04 PM
Well I'll be dammed! I am a pretty good wordsmith, but even I did not know "nescient"!
Thanks Torr!


Lacking knowledge; ignorant: "I ventured into the new Korean restaurant with some equally nescient companions".

n. 1. Absence of knowledge or awareness; ignorance. 2. Agnosticism.
Ross83 Wrote: Nov 06, 2012 12:35 PM
spambots are the pornographers of politics. Its a shame that they democrats have reduced themselves to this level.

If you were expecting a cliff hanger, you still could get one, but really it’s Romney and it likely won’t be close.

There are a few reasons why I think that.

We will delve into those, but we will also look at the voting datapoints provided by pollster Chris Wilson that say an Obama win just isn’t in the cards.

First, let’s list my “feelings” as to why I don’t think Obama will win.

Obama hasn’t delivered.

On anything.

Except perhaps bankrupting anyone who wants to operate coal-fired power plants.

Oh, and keeping gas prices high.