In response to:

The Multitudinous Mitt

loadstar Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 2:34 PM
Is Romney suitably conservative enough? You dance with the one you brung! Romney can beat Obama-- let's gather the troops, focus on the REAL problem, and turn out this Leftist wealth transfer, Big Guvment loser! NO MORE President Food Stamp/Downgrade, Pied Piper of Unwanted Change, Wizard of Ozbama! VOTE Romney!
lkartchner Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 3:11 PM
The President Proposes, the Congress Disposes. If you want to change the direction of Government, you need to change the Congress. That means vote in the kind of Representatives and Senators who will support the sorts of Government we need. It isn't Obama who is responsible for the laws and spending that are crippling our country, it is Harry Reid. Obama just willingly goes along with it all.

As the rest of the world knows, President Obama just isn't a leader.

Finally, Yes, I do agree that Mitt Romney is a leader. And I do plan on voting for him.
NewJAl Wrote: Oct 07, 2012 10:46 PM
If Allen West, Herman Cain, Starr Parker and others like them like Romney, and Hugo Chavez, Bill Ayres, Van Jones and Frances Piven like Obama, then that speaks volumes.
And, judging the character of many of the latter, I would not be surprised at all if some soundly denounced Obama, since they want to make a better World by methods traditionally ascribed to the Devil.

In Wednesday's debate, Mitt Romney said he will "stop the subsidy" to public broadcasting. That's good to know, because Mitt Romney's campaign website says he will merely "reduce subsidies for ... the Corporation for Public Broadcasting."

Kill Big Bird or just pluck some of his feathers? Or neither, in keeping with what often happens to promises made by politicians? As Ted Kennedy once said of Romney's abortion policy, "I am pro-choice. My opponent is multiple choice."

Barack Obama had a tough time in the debate because he was told he would be debating Mitt Romney, a self-described "severely conservative"...