In response to:

Obama's Signature Move: Unsealing Private Records

loadstar Wrote: Aug 02, 2012 1:42 PM
Speaking of hidden records?! Obama was VERY CAREFULLY packaged by 3 bright, leftist Jewish handlers who kept him well-scripted and zealously concealed details of his past-- David Axelrod, David Plouffe, and Rahmbo "Dead Fish" Emanuel. Valerie Jarrett was also in the background keeping a sock in Michelle's mouth to obviate more revealing gaffes like "I am proud of my country for the first time in my adult life...." We have NEVER had a contender for POTUS with such a vague, willfully obfuscated past...also arguably never one with NO executive or real job experience.
skywalker58 Wrote: Aug 02, 2012 2:30 PM
Yet, as is typical of the Left, they are demanding records all the while aggressively keeping, Obama's records under wraps. Do as I say, not as I do. Hold everyone else to a higher standard than they live by. HYPOCRACY!!!!!!!!!!
If you Democrats are so interested in Romney's records and his time at Bain Capital, why don't you look at Nancy Pelosi's tax records and the financial records of the companies that her wealth is invested in? How did she gain her wealth and is all her money being invested in foreign companies or companies who manufacture their goods overseas? Look into how Harry Reid obtained his wealth!!!!
WAKE UP AMERICA!!!! Throw these low-life, immoral, dirty diaper wearing awful excuses for human beings out of office!

Mitt Romney presents one enormous problem for Barack Obama's campaign: No divorce records. That's why the media are so hot to get their hands on Romney's tax records for the past 25 years. They need something to "pick through, distort and lie about" -- as the Republican candidate says.

Obama's usual campaign method, used in 100 percent of his races, has been to pry into the private records of his opponents.

Democrats aren't going to find any personal dirt on the clean-cut Mormon, so they need complicated tax filings going back decades in order to create the illusion...