In response to:

Going Out on a Limb: Romney Beats Obama, Handily

loadstar Wrote: Nov 05, 2012 2:02 PM
Even Slick Willie Clinton said that Romney was manifestly qualified to be POTUS and praiseworthy (as a man and accomplished person) in myriad areas...and Mitt was not even impeached, or disbarred or caught lying about a zipper challenge! ****************** In marked contrast, so much of O's past is secreted-- WHY is that?! In his unbridled hubris, O had already "written" 2 autobios before anybody had ever even heard of him...but some things have been edited out of later editions. OBAMA cites militant racist Revrund Wright and proud communist Frank Marshall Davis as his most important influences! He could not cite his parents-- they were AWOL!
Handwriting Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 2:20 AM
"Even Slick Willie Clinton said that Romney was manifestly qualified to be POTUS and praiseworthy (as a man and accomplished person) in myriad areas...and Mitt was not even impeached, or disbarred or caught lying about a zipper challenge! "

I cannot find a single shred of evidence to that. Maybe you're referring to a former Hillary Clinton aide that ended up endorsing Romney? Either way, I'm sure you're full of these kinds of false statements. I yearn to point them out at every turn.
Fundamentals usually prevail in American elections. That's bad news for Barack Obama. True, Americans want to think well of their presidents, and many think it would be bad if Americans were perceived as rejecting the first black president.

But it's also true that most voters oppose Obama's major policies and consider unsatisfactory the very sluggish economic recovery -- Friday's job report showed an unemployment uptick.

Also, both national and target state polls show that independents -- voters who don't identify themselves as Democrats or Republicans -- break for Romney.

That might not matter if Democrats outnumbered Republicans by 39 to 32...