In response to:

Can You Imagine King George III Telling Our Nation’s Founders They Couldn’t Have Muskets?

LL in La. Wrote: Jan 06, 2013 9:08 AM
May I finish your excellent comment properly . . .? ". . . but the uber-rich, those that are elected and those whose election results in riches." Thank you. And the academy would like to thank Senator Feinstein (what's her private income?) for re-sparking interest in firearms, highlighting the "compassionate" Democrat Party into prominence again as the party of unintended consequences and further proof that Liberalism is a mental disorder (by definition a cyclical delusion that by doing the sames things over and over and expecting different results you will achieve the results you want), but "richer." For instance, "Great Society" = massive urban blight, fatherless children, higher unemployment, gang murders galore . . .

Don’t you love how the Left and their step-n-fetch media mavens are trying to make law-abiding gun owners the bad guys? You don’t? Yeah, me neither.

From Hollywood’s heavily armed guarded elite to the radical, anti-gun commie rag Journal News, peaceful and upright average Joes are being isolated and concentrated on as the bane of America’s existence just because we righteously and lawfully keep and bear arms.

Hollywood has even cobbled together a little tsk-tsk black and white video demanding our government do something about gun violence. That would be the very gun violence they have glamorized on the big screen...