In response to:

Eddie Haskell Brooks

Linda1538 Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 7:57 AM

So Romney has "disdain" for the 47% he was talking about in a fundraising video? I think you got it wrong. It was about who he would get votes from -- and he's right, most of those on government assistance will probably not vote for him. Unless, of course, seniors and military and those who want to be independent and get a good job. In which case Romney wants to allow ALL americans to achieve the American dream. He could do this by strengthening the economy and thereby there will be more jobs . So four more years of the SAME with BO is going to be any different than the last four? High employment, $16 trillion deficit, etc etc? He has no answers except to trash the 1% (although his Hollywood elite buddies are part of that group)

Join the Debate!

All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.

Jude in CT Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 8:04 AM

It won't be "the same", it will be much worse.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Read Full Story

Eddie Haskell Brooks

New York Times columnist David Brooks is the Eddie Haskell of the Fourth Estate. Like the two-faced sycophant in "Leave It to Beaver," Brooks indulges in excessive politeness while currying favor with political authority. He prides himself on an oily semblance of maturity and rational discourse.

But the phony "conservative" back-stabber, who has spent the last four years slavering over Barack Obama like a One Direction groupie and trashing the tea party like an MSNBC junkie, isn't fooling anyone.

Lately, Brooks has been given to dispensing passive-aggressive advice to GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney. His column this week titled "Thurston Howell...

Related Tags: Mitt Romney The New York Times David Brooks Barack Obama 47 percent