Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

Legitimate Rape Arguments

lillith70 Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 11:37 PM
Choose but choose sooner, preferably before the creative act. The morning after pill is available from doctor's and should be in each rape kit IMO. Late term abortions and those requiring killing of the fetus before the removal so it isn't a viable liability need addressing as does the need for humane things like pain meds for the fetus being killed. How do the dems address the quiet racism in the number of black fetuses being offed in this legali execution of innocents? Irradicat the poor before? Dialog and compromise could lessen the number of abortions. Ban all abortions after the first trimester and teach the young to choose but choose before a life is created or a bundle of cells attach. Forget entirely eliminating birth control
In response to:

Legitimate Rape Arguments

lillith70 Wrote: Aug 27, 2012 11:28 PM
So here the case can be made for how the absolutists in both parties keep the numbers of babies aborted high plant your feet in the tug of war and don't give an inch. I am anti-abortion on demand and in principle but pro-choice in the case of rape, incest and to save the life of the mother. Abortion, an issue to grotesque to be discussed in polite society but who all say they want less of could be a cooperative effort to actually lessen but it keeps both parties minions on their plantations. Making the rape, incest and to save the life (or health)of the mother is humane and if adopted as law would allow any who just must have abortions access to them but would make abortion less socially acceptable as the norm but as a rare necessity.
Are gay activists for NAMBLA? The Civil Rights movement were not expressing the desire for Black Power but it took over the movement and ruined it IMO. And ruined it for the people it was to help rise in society ans integrate. Who are the racial haters of today? A study should number them but the subject is verboten! In the end People usually do not hate people they know. But it is so easy to hate those we name "the other" the nameless, faceless other whom it is okay to mass murder even ala Hitler who tossed gays into the pot with the Jews and Gypsies. GOP or Cons so conveniently, The Other to libs IMO. I was a dem but am too liberal in thought to be a Liberal-trite and ideology-bound. Soaring minds, fuggedit!
Funny, I thought libs were all talk and no do. Go to the PEW report and see who they found was more astute. Libs are so dogmatic that they are predictable which then makes them laughable. All artists are not liberals and neither are all scientists, inventors, etc, but I do believe that gays have benefited mankind with their gifts and maybe just the fact that they weren't grubbing for a living to feed a family freed them to focus i-on other things through the ages. Perhaps that is why God created them? The thing that is not being discussed is the gays that aren't born that way but indoctrinated to a more obstacle bound existence. Gay is kind of in vogue today--sex without responsibility but running the gamut of experience. NAMBLA one
Forgive me if I sin differently than you do? Moderate your own actions to control the actions of others like the rest of us have to do. The gay marriage push isn't about equality but about power and all gays are now out in front making noise to achieve the power to try to legislate respect. When you feel anger, the other person's goal is power. Some bigots exist but the majority isn't but do want our rights. Go for the lesser power thing of gay unions and we can be separate but equal with less power-seeking generated hate IMO. Congress passed a defense of Marriage Act which is the law of the land. Must we be a lawless rabble? Gay unions would solve this issue, protect and defend both gay partner's and traditional marriage rights.
So we are all equal in the eyes of God and Christ who said He came to save all mankind. But we will be judged according to our deeds and every thought and be placed where we belong in His eyes, not in the place sectarians place us. Believing in Jesus or believing Him? Surely in His mercy He would judge a homo-pedophile and destroyer of the young differently that a "monogamous" gay and celibate gays are as Heaven bound as any other believer and doer IMO. This won't sit right with those who take a profession of faith as the only requirement for Heaven and judge who else is hell bound without giving credence to the Book of James.. The Bible says he will forgive whom He forgives and judge not as men do. Whose Bible should be used?
His state legislature overrode his veto on the gay marriage? The blame Romney gets for running as a Republican and winning in Mass is overwhelmingly short visioned. He did balance their fiscal problems but dem like they voted in a dem after. Where is that fiscal balance now? The gays are winning the gay marriage issue by wearing down the public. When it goes over the 50 % line the country will have gay marriage and hence more gay power. Start the promotion of gay unions to offset the trend before it is too late instead of viewing from just your far right POV. The far right brings it upon us by fighting gay unions as if they mean the same or will impact the same as gay marriage. Unions s give rights but less power behind new demands.
Romney is doing fine and others with ideas have the opportunity to to whatever they can by opining, donating, or giving their ideas to the super PACs who can do the controversial stuff and with the GOP-hostile corrupt liberal facilitating media, everything Romney utters is controversial. Diffuse the target by assuming your part and keep reading and blogging. Shoulder part of the load of effort not critique. Romney can't talk to your neighbor for you or give his own money as a small donor for the small donor count that they like to say obama leads in.
And what makes you think He already hasn't? Because He isn't running things the way you prefer or fits your paradigm of what He should produce? He is still in His Heavens and His will will be done as usual--we just have to do our part and be judged on our every deed and thought.
Poorly written and corrected but still hurried: "The Liberals of today are not liberal thinkers but as dogmatic and staid and trite in their ideological absolutes, that they follow with religious zeal, as the old Communist stereotypes of the 1960-70's movies. They would drive any free thinker or truth seeker absolutely bonkers." Add on to that that at least religion is poetic.
How times have changed? Jefferson was a states rights man, power down to the people. They also say Jesus was a liberal but I doubt he would answer to that title now? The Liberals of today are not liberal thinkers but as dogmatic and staid and trite in their ideological absolutes that they follow with religious zeal that they would drive any free thinker or truth seeker absolutely bonkers. Walk the same walk, talk the same talk, and chant the same mantras which are very hate laced in and of themselves. They have no real understanding of the minds of their opposition thinkers, while the opposition can almost speak for them before they get their canned answers formed and spewed. Ask PEW studies--that is if you are curious and dare.
Previous 21 - 30 Next