In response to:

Folks, We Have a Brand New Ballgame

lgoldhammer Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 9:15 AM
It's too bad that his sleezy tactics against Ron Paul at the RNC will probably cost him many of the votes he would have had if he ran a fair fight. Such actions of removing duly nominated delegates, taking others on bus rides to other locations than the convention, changing rules for the nomination with a fake vote at the convention where his oponent had followed all the rules and was shut out of the process were inconceivable in a free country. These tactics seemed the same as what Obama/democrats would do. Good luck convincing folks bad behavior prior to the election will some how become good behavior after the election - if elected. (and yes, I want Obama out of there, but at what cost? Rewarding criminal activity with my vote?)
Jeff_Georgia Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 1:37 PM
Virtually any cost. There is little hope if he wins again. Very little.
Davole Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 11:17 AM
lg... -

Maybe Ron Paul will decide to run as a democrat in the 2016 election.
Davole Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 11:23 AM
Ron Paul certainly didn't have the integrity to contest Gary Johnson for the leadership of the drugged libertarian party!
wmou Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 12:37 PM
Maybe the republicans will nominate a conservative for a change.
anti-neocon Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 4:17 PM
if you really cared about integrity, you would be supporting ron paul, NOT chameleon romney. i see from your extremely ignorant comment, you don't know the first thing about ron paul or libertarianism. it's amusing that someone who supports the socialist obama-lite romney would find any basis for accusing ron paul of anything.
anti-neocon Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 4:21 PM
the republicans nominate an actual conservative?? i think that's next to impossible, but i guess there is a first time for everything. maybe if the party survives long enough, there is a chance it could happen. most likely we will be traveling to distant planets on starships before then.
BarofSoap Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 10:28 AM
I'm a fellow "Paulbot", and I agree.

Romney will never get my vote.
Paulus Textor Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 10:54 AM
Paul was far and away the best candidate, if you really believe in small government and a free society.

Gary Johnson (the LP candidate) is not nearly as good as Paul, but in comparison with the two major party candidates, he's a giant.
JustMC Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 11:09 AM
Yes, and where a write-in vote for Ron Paul will never be counted and (even if the establishment notices it, will be easy to hide from the public), votes for Johnson WILL be counted because he is on the ballot. The establishment and their press cronies will try to suppress this also, announcing only the R and D percentages, but if enough people vote for Johnson, the word will get out.
anti-neocon Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 2:15 PM
both romney and soetoro are anti-liberty and anti-constitution. it's bizarre that anyone would vote for either one of them. america cries out for more and more big government intervention and rejects their own liberty. truely bizarre!!
BSsifter Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 5:46 PM
Vote Johnson, and figure in re-electing Obummer if enough people think like you. Can't see the forest for the trees I see. Let's hope there are not too many of you people, or you will have a hand in handing this country to this loser and watching the country spiral down the drain. Then you will be proud of your meaningless vote I assume?
True Conservative! Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 9:51 AM
STILL fixated on Ron Paul? Pathetic!
Paulus Textor Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 10:52 AM
Still favor the candidate who offered real, substantive change in the direction of liberty? The one who calls for abolishing the Federal Reserve counterfeiting operation, returning to sound money, ending the insane War on Drugs, cutting a cool one trillion from the first year budget?

I'm not wasting my vote by going for either one of the major party candidates. Gary Johnson is far from my ideal candidate, but he's head and shoulders above the two major party candidates.
anti-neocon Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 1:50 PM
it's "pathetic" to be enthusiastic about the constitution and liberty??

what i find to be pathetic is YOU republican party apologists who tolerate your corrupt party lying to your face endlessly, and yet you still support them. that's what is PATHETIC !!!
anti-neocon Wrote: Oct 05, 2012 1:57 PM
PT, don'[t waste your time trying to reason with these brainwashed rombots. this site is for groupthink only, not independent expression of original thought. before you post comments on this site again, make sure you are wearing a cheerleader's outfit with a big "R" on your chest. the theme for today is: "how mittens won the debate". if you can't say anything good about romney, then you are NOT welcome here. take your ron paul nonsense, your constitution nonsense, and your liberty nonsense somewhere else.
Mitt Romney on Wednesday night turned in the finest debate performance of any candidate of either party in the 52 years since Richard Nixon faced John F. Kennedy, with the possible exception of Ronald Reagan's demolition of Jimmy Carter in 1980.

But where Reagan won with style and quips -- "There you go again" -- and his closing line, "Are you better off now than you were four years ago?" Romney crushed Obama on both substance and style.

Mitt was like a contender so keyed up by his title shot that, between rounds, he could not sit on his stool, but...