1 - 10 Next
"Obamacare is not about health care, so much as it is about the redistribution of wealth." Astute comment. It's about redistribution, and control. When Stalin collectivized (i.e., nationalized) agriculture in the U.S.S.R., he wasn't worried about food supplies. He was worried about putting himself in total control of every sector of Soviet society, since he was a huge control freak . Likewise, Obama wasn't worried about medical care when he rammed through the collectivization of American medicine. He just wanted to gain total control of a major sector of our economy. And, he wanted to dole out more freebies to his homies. And just as collectivization wrecked Soviet food production, ObamaCare will permanently trash American medicine. .
In response to:

Could Obama Finally Have Overplayed His Hand

lge Wrote: Mar 05, 2013 1:39 PM
I think Obama's alarmism on the sequester is a b.s. too far. Does anybody believe one word of the garbage this grifter is putting out?
Bipartisan immigration surrender is MEANT to be deceitful. It's meant to disguise the disgusting reality -- that our "leaders" don't have the guts to enforce our laws and don't want to -- with soft, soothing euphemisms.
In response to:

Hillary’s Histrionics Hide Truth

lge Wrote: Jan 28, 2013 10:01 AM
"What difference, at this point, does it make?” Well, she thought it was important enough at the time to lie about it. And they sent Rice out to lie about it. So the question must have some pertinence. The real pertinence of the issue is this: they wanted badly to pin the blame on the American video-maker, so as to say, "It's our own fault; there's no need to do anything. No need to retaliate." So Evita, with her "Don't question me, peasant!" response, is still deflecting any inquiry into their real motivations. .
"In one fell swoop, Barack Obama managed to cripple American healthcare." True dat. (And I can't believe I said dat.) Obamacare will do for American medical care what Stalin's collectivization (or nationalization) of agriculture did for the Soviet diet. .
The same old leftist line. They always attribute motives, because 1) they can't argue on the issues substantively; their policies are insane. And 2) motives are unseen and unknowable. Leftist troll can argue motives all day long and prove nothing. It proves nothing except this: motive-mongering proves leftists have no arguments, just character assassination. They're bankrupt. .
Dear Sylvester Puddy-Tat Matthews: can you please quit saying "Sosh Security"? And say it, don't spray it. Matthews' solution is, "MSNBC will save you, Obama. Call on us." .
In response to:

Romney Dominates In First Debate

lge Wrote: Oct 04, 2012 12:02 AM
Obama's most comfortable in venues where people just admire his adorableness, like "The View," or a pizza restaurant where he gets a big hug. He's been campaigning like a little kid, called into the living room by his parents to show off for guests. All he has to do in such events is let the guests fawn on him. Debates call for a little more than that, especially when the jive-talk and B.S. wear thin. . .
In response to:

Is Our President a Bit of a Jerk?

lge Wrote: Sep 03, 2012 12:13 PM
He's a rotten little spoiled brat. He's been told how wonderful and precious he is by everyone he knows, all his life. And he's been pushed ahead and advanced on the basis of no merit of his own. So he campaigns like a little kid, who has been called in by his parents to show off for visitors. "Look how precious and adorable I am!" Some qualification!
In response to:

Can Obama Fool Enough People Most of the Time?

lge Wrote: Jul 18, 2012 11:52 AM
Obama's minions have a lot of nerve harping on this trumped-up controversy, when the Obama administration is outsourcing a light attack plane to Brazil. Brazilian company Embraer (and its American affiliate) will be producing the new military plane. Like we don't have American companies that could use the work?
1 - 10 Next