In response to:

CIA Holding Secret Prisoners in Benghazi?

Leslie96 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 1:06 PM
Seems all to convenient to me...call me a skeptic but....when will the truth ever be reliable again?
Kachina27284 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 2:22 PM
Jon Russo Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 2:38 PM
It's what's left after the alternatives are proven wrong.
Summers Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 2:04 PM
The truth is always reliable. The truth never varies. The real question is when will we ever get the truth again.
Petrus64 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 1:35 PM
The truth is no longer available in the MSM. They simply tell you the story they want you to hear.

In searching for the truth, one can find an alternative story. Such as, the General was pulled over while driving Friday (there may have even been some gunfire exchange written off as DC violence). He was then taken to the WH and forced to resign.

According to David Petraeus' mistress number one, Paula Broadwell, the CIA annex and U.S. consulate in Benghazi may have been attacked on 9/11 in an effort to free Libyan prisoners the CIA was secretly holding.


In 2009, the Obama administration signed an executive order banning secret CIA interrogation prisons overseas.

Saying that “our ideals give us the strength and moral high ground” to combat terrorism, President Obama signed executive orders Thursday ending the Central Intelligence Agency’s secret overseas prisons, banning coercive interrogation methods and closing...