In response to:

That Tail Ain't a Leg

lemonfemale Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 2:41 PM
I'd go for that. I believe the term would come to mean gay marriage soon enough. And FYI, I've no objection to gay folk getting married.
TommyMaq Wrote: Feb 20, 2013 12:09 AM
"Voluntary mutual ownership" doesn't mention gender, actually.
TommyMaq Wrote: Feb 20, 2013 12:08 AM
Why?

(Claims without evidence still prove you have bupkis.)
Beethovens10th Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 7:30 PM
I've got some magnolia leaves in my yard. Okay if I call them equivalent to greenbacks? I want the government to declare that they are, obligating every merchant and creditor to recognize them as real money. After all, I could certainly BENEFIT from such a law, so why are you being such a hateful bigot?

Okay, so it's just me wanting this redefinition. But, if I can get a handful of my friends and, say, a few neighbors with magnolia trees to picket the local mint, courthouses and representative offices, can I have this?

Does Chief Justice Roberts have a Magnolia tree?
DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 3:12 PM
You *should* have an objection to unequal relationships being legally treated as equal.

Recently, Steven Spielberg released his award-winning film Lincoln. In one scene, Lincoln saunters into the War Room and has one of those conversations, mixing philosophy with his thoughtful wit, with two young men.

Lincoln asks them if they ever studied Euclid and then dives into his point:

Euclid's first common notion is this: “Things which are equal to the same thing are equal to each other.” That’s a rule of mathematical reasoning. It’s true because it works. Has done and always will do. In his book, Euclid says this is self-evident. You see, there it is. Even in that 2,000 year...
Saturday, May 25 | 03:50 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 03:50 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 03:50 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 03:50 AM ET