1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Death On Campus

Lee651 Wrote: May 29, 2014 1:26 PM
Universities have become what liberals desire. The students are brainwashed to be robots with overcharged (and encouraged to mental deranegement) sex drives. They are taught that fact comes from whoever can curse the loudest when someone disagrees. Taxes pay for these robot factories to keep in business. So what do those in charge really care? Their gold plated kitchen faucets won't rust over an issue as paltry as killing off our country one student at a time. Then one day when it all collapses around us, they will point their fingers ad say it was the people who disagreed with them who are at fault. But... they will have to be accountable when standing before God, and they will have to pay for it. I truly feel sorrow for them in light of eternity.
It is hard for puppets to cut their own strings. Liberals base life and decisions on their feelings. Feelings are a matter of heart. The Bible says the heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked. This is not to say man cannot do the proper thing at times, it is to say that the heart can be, and is deceived so very easily. Facts and self discipline are what brings about the good actions. Setting up feeling as the primary source of motivation is what sets the stage for people who THINK they are fighting for rights, when reality shows they really are being suckered into giving them up.
In response to:

What was D-Day?

Lee651 Wrote: May 29, 2014 12:58 PM
Thanks you for this article. I get tired of know-it-all modern, self proclaimed experts slamming US actions in WWII. How easy for us, now so very many years after the war's end, to look back and think we have the answers to what SHOULD have been the proper methods of bringing the war to an end. How childish, rude, and proud (in the wrong way), we are to criticize even something like the atom bomb. How many more people would have died had it not been used? Estimates are 6 MILLION more - including Japanese and Americans - with a ground invasion. I remember an old Star Trek episode, "A Taste of Armageddon," taught the lesson that if we take the horror out of warfare, we end up killing more people b/c we are not as desperate to end the war. This is just one more reason why so many modern Americans lives are lost in wars on so much smaller a scale - such as Afghanistan when compared to WWII - that take increasingly more and more time to win. We "humanely" create less victims in other countries while killing off our own boys. And then the people we sacrificed the lives of our own boys for spit in our faces. How long would the people of a nation put up with terrorism in their borders if they knew certain retribution for allowing them to hide in their country was coming? How long would it take for a country to rise up for themselves and oust the idiots responsible for terrorism if they knew NOT taking action would cost them if the terrorists decided to act against the US and bring their own destruction? Instead they all sit back and let the Americans die to handle the problem they should have taken care of themselves. One of my vet friends was relaying an account to me where there were people shooting at them from inside a house. He said they had an anti-tank weapon with them that would have leveled the house and everything inside. But instead they were forced to advance w/ rifles b/c they were not given permission to use the weapon that would have done the job for them. Their superiors (over the radio in safety) said the use of the weapon was too excessive. So instead they had to risk their lives in order to try to more humanely kill someone who was shooting at them. The people who made the decisions during WWII surely made mistakes b/c they were human. But they obviously did an amazing job or we would not be around to criticize their actions. What a slap in the face to these heroes.
In response to:

A Young College Grad Calls My Show

Lee651 Wrote: May 27, 2014 2:40 PM
History will teach us what has worked best and what has worked worst - IF we care about facts rather than our own opinions. War will always be with us. Killing will always be with us. History has shown that the actions which eliminate the most of these evils have been the best. The atom bombs on Japan were a HORRIBLE thing. But what liberals of this day forget to mention is that the study behind the rationale for using it had computed it as the lesser of two evils, believing that millions of lives (on both sides) would be lost if the alternative - a land invasion of Japan - were carried out. It is always easy for those not faced with a dilemma to lecture and speculate about how it should be handled. It is especially easy for liberals to insult America by ignoring the facts of the matter at the time decisions have had to be made. But it also is incredibly easy to study history to find and learn from past mistakes - something liberals cannot stand - facts.
And emphasize one more point. Today's masses of complainers makes for a good opportunity for those who can take some initial discomfort. Take a job where you can advance (yes, like Target or Walmart vs factory work). When you have to start working at the bottom, you will probably not like it. Suck it up, work hard anyway, and do so with a good attitude instead of complaining. Your superiors will see you are a leader and not a typical loser. Your bosses likely are in desperate need of leaders to help them manage the ever growing masses of losers. When someone shines, bosses see them for the non-losers they are, and bosses are willing to pay them well. Bosses start moving the non-losers up through the ranks at an accelerated pace (though still NOT overnight!) - expect at least a couple years at the bottom. This is experience talking from needing people to help manage others, and also from having started over at the bottom throughout the years (my choice).
Islam will likely be the one world religion the Bible says is coming. They will be Satan's tool in slaughtering all who do not agree with them (sound familiar?), and want every Jew killed (sound familiar?). Islam will not just "go away" until the final battle when Christ Himself comes and pours out God's wrath at Armageddon. The main hotbed of violence in this world was started by Abram;s sin when he did not wait fot eh promised child, Isaac, from God, but instead went in to his handmaid and Ishmael was conceived. The son Isaac was a the root of the Jewish nation. Ishmael is at the root of Islam. The battle has waged ever since - the hotbed of violence in the world is between these two nations of people with Ishmael's spawn being the main aggressors (Islam) - to this day Muslims are still taught they are justified in killing those who won't adopt Islam. So it is likely the same problem will blossom into the war of the end times. Islam likely will spread worldwide through its murderous tactics as Satan's final trial of defying God. And, just as history has proven, the Bible again will be correct when Satan is defeated by Christ.
In response to:

Twitter Gets A Hero

Lee651 Wrote: May 18, 2014 1:04 PM
You have to wonder why you don't hear such amazing stories happening in communist and Muslim countries. After all our media assures us these are the best places/ways of life. - obviously said tongue in cheek God bless this family.
In response to:

Welcome To The Gay Agenda Re-Education Camp

Lee651 Wrote: May 18, 2014 12:57 PM
Are you a puppet when it comes to the homosexual lie?  It is NOT genetic, it is curable, and you have been brainwashed if you think otherwise.  Here are the verifiable facts - check them out for yourself. In the 1980s, Dr, Spitner of  the American Psychological Association overjoyed the homosexuals when he made the proclamation that homosexuality is genetic.  Anyone with even a limited scientific knowledge back then knew this statement to be a lie b/c genetics had not advanced to the point of even being able to tell us  something as simple (now) as what genes make up eye color - let alone the claim that this perverted (this is not an insult in this context) mindset was genetic. The media, however, kept with their old lie of, "if you repeat it often enough, people will believe it as truth."  They knew it was a lie - but their agenda was to brainwash the masses. In 2003, the very same Dr. Spitner of the APA nullified their 1980's proclamation of homosexuality being genetic b/c the science of genetics had advanced enough to prove the statement a lie.  Dr. Spitner admitted that when the original statment the homosexuals so cherished was made, that there was absoultely NO SCIENCE behind the statement and it was all POLITICAL PRESSURE.  But the damage was already done. Before the liberal propaganda started, the APA classified homosexuality, and other sexual perversions, as a mental derangement.  Note the term derangement is often falsely thought of as being something that a person is not responsible for themselves.  They have gone back to this scientifically backed stand.  They say they are not sure what causes it, but suspect it is caused by both "nature and nurture." What does "nature and nurture" mean?  Any person with knowledge of psychology and how the subconscious and conscious minds work together knows that what a person believes as fact is stored in the subconscious.  The subconscious mind stores what we believe to be facts/experience/information/truth.  When a decision is to be made, the conscious mind refers to the information stored in the subconscious and actions are taken based on what is stored there.  Spread the truth - its all verifiable by those who are willing to do a little homework.
In response to:

No Room on Campus for the Bigot Shakespeare

Lee651 Wrote: May 17, 2014 12:09 AM
Um... Aramaic Also - an in depth study of the manuscripts from which the bible is written shows the majority of modern translations are from the two manuscript versions which are most at odds (thousands of conflicts, and not just in grammar - but in actual doctrine) with all the rest. Then there is the Westscott-Hort fiasco of them making their own text - and this also is widely used for most of the modern translations. Even something as innocent - seemingly - as the New King James leaves out doctrinal teachings. How? The New King James eliminates words such as thee, thine, and ye. So what? The New testament was written in Koine Greek. Putting it in laymen's terms, the Greeks had legitimate word in their language for what meaning some modern people use the slang words/phrases"yall," "Ynze." "Youse guys," etc. King James English (and technically our modern English) has no actual word that is a "you plural." So to keep true to the translation, and being mindful not to offend their God bt changing the meaning of verses, the KJV translators put in the word "ye." But the NEW King James eliminates the textual meaning God wanted by putting "you." So when Jesus said to a man, "Ye must be born again," the New King James wrongly strips away the meaning by saying you (singular) must be born again. Christ was not saying to one man that that one man had to be born again, he was telling that man EVERYONE needs to be born again. He was preaching salvation is for everyone and everyone is in need of it. This cannot be derived form the text of the New King James - they erased it. Such is the case for every place the New King James people erased the word "Ye." And if this seems like no big deal, the a person needs to study what it means when Christ says that not one jot of tittle of the Scriptures should be changed b/c it is sin.
In response to:

No Room on Campus for the Bigot Shakespeare

Lee651 Wrote: May 16, 2014 11:53 PM
B/c the Romans, Jews, and Greeks were in that locale.
1 - 10 Next