In response to:

'Dialogue' Required for Violent Video Games

LecturerRich Wrote: Feb 22, 2013 4:35 PM
It is not about violent video games, or even really about guns, but about control. The left wants the removal of guns as a way of controlling their "subjects". An Armed subject is not really a subject are they?
Carl469 Wrote: Feb 22, 2013 6:16 PM
And Brent wants to control the availability of video games. Political control, apparently, is a game that conservatives play, too.
America is Over Wrote: Feb 22, 2013 6:31 PM
Bozell suggested a "dialogue". Dialogue does not mean "ban" or "regulate".

Liberals lie. It's what they do.
scrow Wrote: Feb 22, 2013 5:51 PM
So who wants to control people by banning and/or regulating video games?
America is Over Wrote: Feb 22, 2013 5:49 PM
Liberals hate men. The men, they want to control. Everybody else can run wild.

The Obama administration's assault on the Second Amendment in reaction to Newtown is not a serious solution. It's a Band-Aid on cancer. The NRA's call for armed guards in every school also misses the point. When is anyone going to get serious? The problem is violence, a violence of monstrous and horrific proportions that has infected America's popular culture.

The Hartford Courant reported on Sunday that during a search of Newtown grade-school killer Adam Lanza's home after the shootings, "police found thousands of dollars worth of graphically violent video games." Detectives are exploring whether Adam Lanza might have been emulating the...