Previous 21 - 30 Next
You all accuse me of not learning. But let me show you how this works. Cotton goes on the floor on Congress and makes a statement that appears on its face to be a lie. But, I could be wrong. So I come here to hear what you all say as a defense of his statement. And what I've learned is that the key is being on the FBI watch list.
In order to Cotton's comments to be accurate, that there were 5 attacks under Obama, and 0 under Bushm you all here are saying that all those involved in those 5 attacks under Obama were under the FBI watch list. Is that your position?
In order to Cotton's comments to be accurate you all here are saying that all those involved in those 5 attacks were under the FBI watch list. Is that right. To my knowledge, only 1 was under the watch list.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=KUsR8kUF-aY
Budwiser. Ok. Do you know that the all the people that are involved in the 5 Attacks that Cotton references were on the FBI watch list?
Why doesn't 9/11 count as terrorism under Bush's watch?
So, let me understand. That Cotton was saying that the 5 he mentioned were all radicalized. And the DC Beltway snipers were not radicalized????? Or the LA Airport Killer was not radicalized????
Uber, OK. That is 1. What about the other 4 that Cotton mentions??? And What about Cotton's point that there were 0 under Bush (of course 9/11 doesn't count for some reason).
Cotton's point is not accurate. He said 0 under Bush. I just named 3. And he forgot 9/11.
Cotton's point is not accurate. He said 0 under Bush. I just named 3.
BudWiser Wrote: 10 minutes ago (7:42 PM) were they on a watch list? ------- This is in defense of Cotton's claim of 5 Terrorist attacks under Obama. Incredible. I not believe that all the terrorists that Cotton references were on the FBI watch list.
Previous 21 - 30 Next