In response to:

What Foreign Policy Debate?

LCB1 Wrote: Oct 17, 2012 9:30 AM
I tihnk the reason these parties agree with one another is because niether of them have a clue about foreign policy. And Paul hit the nail on the head. We are in to many places at the same time with knowledge of nothing and the refusal to listen to sound judgment....our Constituon. I'll still vote for Romney but we need more than a finacial genious to get our nation out of the predicament its in. Lets get out and leave those hot spots ALONE. Obama is spending all this money for these stupid wars plus giving the Brotherhood a billion dollars ANUALLY. Where is the common sense in that? What the heck is really going on?
MoreFreedom Wrote: Oct 17, 2012 10:44 AM
The Demopublicans do have a clue about foreign policy. They know they can get lots of campaign cash from the military industrial complex, and favors from foreign governments (e.g., illegal campaign cash provided via hundreds of paid debit cards that aren't traceable in amounts under $200) for foreign aid and military meddling overseas. They also get blowback such as 9/11, Khobar towers, bombing of the Cole, and the killing of our Libyan ambassador - which they then use to ask for more spending.
Next week, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are scheduled to meet for their third and final presidential debate, this time focusing on foreign policy. Although he will be on the ballot in at least 48 states on Nov. 6, Gary Johnson, the Libertarian Party's nominee, was not invited, lest an actual debate about foreign policy break out.

Johnson, a former Republican governor of New Mexico, believes that so-called defense spending should be used for defense, that the United States "should resort to military action as the last option and only as provided in the Constitution" and that our foreign policy should...

Saturday, May 25 | 12:20 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 12:20 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 12:20 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 12:20 AM ET