Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

Sheila Jackson Lee: Turn in Your Guns

Lawrence29 Wrote: Dec 20, 2012 5:27 PM
Funny how the left is so adamant about defending the 1st Amendment and so quick to attack the other Amendments. It's kind of like demanding we obey the 1st Biblical Commandment, while at the same time demanding we ignore the other 9.
In response to:

Sheila Jackson Lee: Turn in Your Guns

Lawrence29 Wrote: Dec 20, 2012 5:25 PM
Lawrence to Shiela: Turn in Your Donuts.
I am a university administrator. I can say with 100% certainty that American University and College Campus are some of the most dangerous living environments for young teens and not quite mature college students. In our efforts toward freedom we are making it as dangerous as possible. And I cannot recommend any parent send their child to a university or college with any assumption of physical safety.
Hey, I know, lets just go ahead and make it a one-party communist system. Elect Obama our communist leader/dictator and be done with all this silly political infighting non-sense ... Obama would love to make all our decisions for us, and we would no longer have to worry about all this tedious government by the people stuff.
I hear Laura Ingraham is free. But that isn't they kind of free-thinking woman Ginsberg wants on the bench with her. Ginsberg is more interested in compliant-thinking women like herself. Compliant to political correctness rather than a free-thinking constitutionalist like Laura.
... that is because there wasn't any coverup efforts nor government conspiracies going on prior to the attack. Our Intel got caught by surprise and have tried to explain it away, but as of today, nobody has been able to corroborate with real facts that Bush lied about anything. 20-20 hind-sight reflects he was wrong on some issues, but there is absolutely no evidence of any kind that Bush purposely tried to deceive anyone.
The truth here is so simple that absolutely nobody is going to accept it, and thus fuel the continual Psi-Ops cover-up of the incompetence involved. … and probably the only competent official in this whole debacle will be the one taking the blame for it, and the fall for it. Sorry Petraeus but you’re not the first person that Obama has thrown under the bus. With 20-20 hind-sight Petraeus can say he knew (more likely highly suspected on a personal level) the attack was a planned terrorist effort, but that personal belief on his part was not corroborated as official by his organization, nor by Sec.Def or Administration officials.
What is most plausible is the CIA and government intel where simply caught by surprise and failed to properly react. Nobody wants to believe our intel community could be this incompetent so we are taking this simple explanation as implausible, when logically it is the only version of events that makes any logical sense. Furthermore, Petraeus is an honorable military officer, he would not resign his post over an intel kerfluffle. Nobody asked him to resign or challenged him to resign. His resignation is purely based on getting caught with his pants down, a direct violation of his own personal honor code.
Here is the most plausible story: The CIA didn’t know or didn’t realize the attack was an orchestrated terrorist attack and that is why they didn’t ask for or send in backup. The cover-up is the government, Administration, Sec.Def., CIA, covering up the fact that they were totally fooled (and incompetent) in mistaking this coordinated attack as a mere political demonstration. What we don’t know is where Rice got the information that this was all caused by the silly video. So, lets look back at what I said about Psi-Ops. The most logically implausible story is the one Rice told about the video being the cause, but emotionally it is the story everyone wants to accept as plausible.
What we found out (which the CIA didn’t initially believe themselves) is that the attack was orchestrated by a powerful terrorist group for a very specific purpose. Question here is, why did the CIA not know this right from the start? Either they are dumb and misread the warnings, or they faked themselves out with their own Psi-Ops, assuming this kind of terrorist attack so implausible that they couldn’t believe it when they saw it. Now… we have so much implausible arm-chair generalling going on that nobody can tell what is plausible or implausbile, and filling in the details with their imaginations.
We must first remember the goal of Psi-Ops which is to make the unplausible seem plausible and this is accomplished my making the plausible seem unplausible. What the CIA reported initially was a demonstration fueled by the Egyptian demonstration and whatever fueled that demonstration. Nothing in the CIA report mentions the silly video in question. This is what Petraeus reported to congress and the truth as far as he knew it. Somewhere between the CIA and Rice the issue of the video was added and Rice reported that. Or more correctly, parroted it, but it is the truth as she knew it.
Previous 21 - 30 Next