In response to:

Waiving Freedom

LASTMANSTANDING Wrote: Nov 06, 2012 12:26 PM
You would be funny if this was not such an important subject. The majority of the "socialism" projects your ranting about came from democratic congresses and presidents. If, for example LBJ and his democratic congress had not robber the S.S.FUND in 1963 and put the money in the general fund and spent it. Which policy by the way has continued through the years, any surplus of S.S. money at the end of a budget year has been automatically place in the general fund and spent. If this had never happened, S.S. WOULD BE IN GOOD SHAPE TODAY. I draw S.S. and when I think about how the democrats keep adding more programs to be funded by S.S. because if they told the people what it really cost for their programs, they would get voted out of office.
Among the objections to ObamaCare, one that has not gotten as much attention as it should is the president's power to waive the law for any company, union or other enterprise he chooses.

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution provides for "equal protection of the laws" for all Americans. To have a law that can cost an organization millions of dollars a year either apply or not apply, depending on the whim or political interest of the President of the United States, is to make a mockery of the rule of law.

How secure is any freedom when there is this kind of...