Previous 21 - 30 Next
DIAMONDS AND DIRT CLODS: Some amoral judges/legislators/apostate religious leaders/Hollywood-propagandized duped voters, intolerantly forcing their pagan religion of post-modernism on others, may declare that a dirt clod is a diamond and the dirt clod could be considered to be a "diamond", by those of like-minded post-modernistic rejection of objective truth; but physically it would still be a dirt clod no matter what the arrogant, elitist, “Enlightened” oligarchs and their easily manipulated minions declare. Thus, when it comes to the diamond standard of marriage, A REAL marriage can only occur between members of the opposite sex, since that is the only kind of marriage that can be consummated in coitus rather than sodomy or penetration by a fist or cylindrical instrument, (as in the case of lesbians), and it is the only kind, that under normal circumstances of good health and sufficient youth, has the biological potential of eventually being manifested in the two actually becoming "one flesh", i.e. the joining of their genetic material into another, new and unique human being. These things are a total impossibility in a dirt clod homosexual "marriage". So, no matter what the amoral, arrogant, normal-phobic judicial, business, political, apostate religious, cultural elites and their brainwashed automatons declare, they and the sexually dysfunctional homosexuals to whom they pander, will only be fooling themselves. The rest of us, those who are normal and not afflicted with moral relativism and the cancerous tumor of political correctness, will always be able to recognize a dirt clod when we see one.
Congress, composed of statist, constitution-contemptuous, power-greedy thugs, will applaud the plans of the IRS-Gestapo to further harass patriots.
In response to:

Thank you, Hobby Lobby

Larry1652 Wrote: Nov 27, 2013 1:37 PM
Don't you know that the implied progressive/liberal view of women is that they are hapless and helpless idiots who are incapable of working for their own birth control and baby-killing drugs. That's why many progressive/libera women are pro-slavery, believing that a state-slave fellow citizen should be forced to work for and pay for those things.
In response to:

Thank you, Hobby Lobby

Larry1652 Wrote: Nov 27, 2013 1:34 PM
I hope you're right, but it seems to me that most of the justices on SCOTUS are die-hard statists who believe that the tyrannical expansion of Federal power trumps the the Bill of Rights and the 9th and 10th Amendments. I'd be surprised if they do not uphold the ObamaCare trampling of the 1st Amendment's "Free Exercise" clause and turn it into the "Fee Exercise" clause. In other words, if you choose to practice your religion outside of the dogmatic constraints of their government established religion of statism, you'll pay a fee in the form of fines, imprisonment or government sanctioned lawsuits.
In response to:

Thank you, Hobby Lobby

Larry1652 Wrote: Nov 27, 2013 1:32 PM
That would be true if you have a right to the pocket of someone else, which is defacto slavery. Where in the Constitution does it say that you have a right to a state-slave?
In response to:

Thank you, Hobby Lobby

Larry1652 Wrote: Nov 27, 2013 1:31 PM
THE "FEE" EXERCISE CLAUSE: Most of the justices on SCOTUS are die-hard statists who believe that the tyrannical expansion of Federal power trumps the the Bill of Rights and the 9th and 10th Amendments. I'd be surprised if they do not uphold the ObamaCare trampling of the 1st Amendment's "Free Exercise" clause and turn it into the "Fee Exercise" clause. In other words, if you choose to practice your religion outside of the dogmatic constraints of their government established religion of statism, you'll pay a fee in the form of fines, imprisonment or government sanctioned lawsuits.
You can bet the pimples on your butt that the racist Benghazi-liar Obama's racist Attorney General Eric Holder will not be sending Department Of Justice personnel to Washington state to organize protests against the Black perps who killed the old vet like he did against George Zimmerman, nor will he be opening a civil rights violation investigation against the animals who did this like he did against George Zimmerman. Why? "Yo dawg, cuz dey be Black and dey be duh victims of White privilege and dey be victims of duh legacy of slaveryl. Ya knoz whats I be say'n?"
He's got my vote for prez.
A courageous Republican? Other than Ted Cruz, that's an oxymoron!
In response to:

Edward Snowden's Just Rewards

Larry1652 Wrote: Jul 11, 2013 11:18 AM
Well said but don't expect Emmett, a puppet of the constitution-contemptuous DemonKrap & RepubliGoon ruling duopoly to understand let alone agree.
Another example of the tyranny of the constitution-contemptuous DemonKrap & RepubliGoon ruling duopoly. Where the hell in the constitution is the Federal Government given the authority to dictate what our kids eat for lunch?
Previous 21 - 30 Next