In response to:

Even in SF, There Is No Free Naked Lunch

Lardo2 Wrote: Oct 09, 2012 1:53 PM
I love how they blame it on "out of towners". The national "home" of the rabbid homosexual. And we all know how the love to flaunt their chosen lifestyle in everyone's face. (Not that they are the ONLY ones.) What did they expect from such a "tolerant" position? Yet, in a prime example of 'sticking-your-head-in-the-sand', they blame the inevitable outcome on someone else. Rather than themselves. Typical leftwingism. Demand the right to debauchery. And when it all blows up in your face... deny culpability. they're all a bunch of children. Spoiled, selfish children.
Zdravko Wrote: Oct 09, 2012 4:27 PM
You are talking about AIDS, right? It's costing us a true fortune to take care of those "free spirits".
The news release headline reads, "Supervisor Wiener to introduce legislation restricting public nudity to appropriate venues." That's San Francisco City Hall-speak for: The city is getting ready to ban public nudity, but not from the Folsom Street Fair or other public venues where nudity has been known to make cameo appearances.

If the San Francisco Board of Supervisors actually does ban public nudity, it will do so after so much hand-wringing you would think the supes had been handcuffed to reality and forced to stare at too much sagging skin.

I feel for Scott Wiener -- who was elected in 2010, just as...

Related Tags: San Francisco
Friday, May 24 | 04:20 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 04:20 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 04:20 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 04:20 PM ET