1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Now You're Messin' with a Son of a B*tch!

lanczos Wrote: Sep 11, 2011 6:07 PM
Thanks for all these refs. I have always thought that Mitt was a little too "Slick". Too eager for more, more, More, MORE Big Gummint. Too eager to "work with my good friends across the aisle." Well, NUTZ to that. Now with the snot-filled Wimpublican "elites" chattering endlessly about him (and the slime-media touting him as the "frontrunner" HAH!), it is clear that the original impression was correct.
In response to:

The Kennedy Curve

lanczos Wrote: Apr 24, 2011 4:27 PM
Can hardly wait to see the libturd reply to your comment. Let me get out my crystal ball: it says, "The reply will begin with, 'Well, yes, but George W. Bush...' " This, of course, confirms the truth of the article.
In response to:

Taxing the Rich

lanczos Wrote: Sep 29, 2010 6:45 PM
Frank - And a libtard like you is a COMPLETE IMBECILE. Don't even bother to try to make a factual argument against the premise of the article. If someone asks you what time it is, your reply is, "Well, the position of the Sun can't be relied upon." That's the libtard debate technique, en toto: 1. *Everyone* Knows You're Wrong. [end of statement.] 2. "Yeah, but George W. Bush was a..." 3. "You're a poopoo-head." Here's a clue, libtard: When you go DIRECTLY to #3, it means that you are a LOSER An AUTOMATIC LOSER. (And your Mom was a loser, too...)
In response to:

The Next Hoover

lanczos Wrote: Sep 10, 2010 5:03 PM
My daughter is employed by a solar power company (as a Sr. Engr.) Not only is your comment factually wrong, it is stupid beyond imbecility. But given your other comments on this thread and on many others, that is exactly what one would expect.
Let's see: A $1,000,000,000 "investment" that, if history is any measure, will sit idle and profitless for 30-40 years before it might be needed. Sounds GREAT! Where can I buy into this bonanza?
The real reason that Progressives are upset with President mmm mmm mmm is each one believed that by now, he/she/it would be: * Commissar of a Peoples Agricultural District, or * Commissar of a Peoples Health Bureau, or * Commissar of a Peoples Industrial and Manufacturing Facility, or * Commissar of a Peoples Energy Apportionment Office, or at least * Commissar of Political Thought in a Peoples Residential Re-Education Center.
Here are the rules for war: 1. First you win. 2. Then you can make Nice-Nice all you want. But this follows 1. 3a. You win a war by kicking the opponent's booboo. 3b. The opponent has to understand that his booboo was kicked, and be unable to suffer any more booboo kicks. You can ignore these rules, and here's what you will get: Best Case Scenario: Korea - The Endless "Police Action" Worst Case Scenario: VietNam.
It's all the chaos that is being inflicted upon the economy. Who in their right mind would start a business in the USSA any more? Government seizing businesses? Government propping up some businesses while allowing others to fail? Hey leftists - there's a definition for that - I mean an actual historical term for that activity... The taxes upon taxes and fees upon fees are bad enough, but the killer aspect is the regulations. Regs, often conflicting, are promulgated by government at all levels. And they are drafted by anonymous bureaucrats - how do you vote THEM out - Can't. We have squandered the greatest country in the history of the world. Only a return to Constitutional government will allow us to survive as a nation. I...
In response to:

It's Really About Controlling Our Lives

lanczos Wrote: Jul 17, 2010 8:25 AM
Keep this article in mind as you read Dan Kennedy's article today about why wealth is fleeing the USSA.
Evidently, someone left the top off the septic system again.

And guess what: ALL of their posts are ad hominem attacks on Ann Coulter or on other posters. Obviously they are incapable of responding to the contents of the article, or they would be doing so in this forum.

And acorn must be paying them by the post.
1 - 10 Next