In response to:

Don't Blame Romney

ladyofthemanor Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 11:51 PM
Of all the Repub candidates running, Romney was the best choice. He wasn't perfect; a lot of mistakes were made during his campaign. But better and more experienced campaign managers would have seen problems earlier and made adjustments faster. The idea was to get rid of Obum first, and then elect a true conservative later. As O'Reilly said, the ''free stuff '' swayed a lot of voters who were unwilling to give that up.
pastorial Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 9:24 AM
l, imho, Romney was the worst choice.

Jon Huntsman would have been a better choice.
teetime Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 11:52 AM
Really? Just this morning it was reported that John Huntsman is being considered the person to follow Hillary as Sec. of State.
teetime Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 11:54 AM
Oops! Just spelled Jon Huntsman's name incorrectly. He is so well known.
pastorial Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 1:34 PM
really? i had not heard that! he would be good.

she needs some rest so she can run in 2016.
pastorial Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 1:35 PM
but you spelled it rig!tht

We spent billions of dollars and billions of words on an election to switch from President Obama, a Democratic Senate and a Republican House to President Obama, a Democratic Senate and a Republican House.

Every election predictor was wrong, except one: Incumbents usually win.

Republicans have taken out a sitting president only once in the last century, and that was in 1980 when Ronald Reagan beat Jimmy Carter. Sadly, Reagan's record remains secure.

The Democrats ran up against the incumbency problem in 2004. The landslide election for Democrats in 2006 suggests that Americans were not thrilled with...

Related Tags: Mitt Romney Barack Obama