In response to:

Why Republicans Are Poised To Lose The Second Amendment Battle

KYoung43 Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 10:06 AM
Progressives never let the hypocrisy or unintended consequences of their legislation get in the way of "politics of emotion, fear and envy." The "share the wealth" ploy hits on the parasite class, school dropouts unwilling to get training or the diploma, take showers, listen to alarm clocks, get up and go to work for a living. Fear is evident with the scare tactics of "if we don't pass this piece of legislation, you'll DIE," the "pre-existing condition" cloud hanging over many uninsureds' heads. No look at HISTORY (even present-day statistics) that show what happened when citizens willingly gave up the right to protect themselves. They become subjects--or statistics. The party of CHOICE is for children? Give me a break.
NewJAl Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 10:25 AM
The un-aborted children grow up with no jobs, and a need to get welfare. If any Progressive says they love kids, I will laugh in their face. Worst than liars. The unemployed college kids are taught to blame scapegoats, while the business owner has the answers, and is frustrated at every turn in expanding their business.

You have to give progressives credit. They’re nothing if not thorough. When an opportunity to limit the Second Amendment presented itself in the Sandy Hook massacre, regardless how tasteless it was to exploit that opportunity, they went full bore toward their goal.

Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., introduced sweeping so-called “assault weapons” ban legislation this week that would place unprecedented restrictions on individuals’ rights to own, use, sell and even pass along already owned firearms to family members. But given where things stand now in the polls and political atmosphere, that legislation will go nowhere.

But the Constitution and the...