In response to:

Why Republicans Are Poised To Lose The Second Amendment Battle

Kymberly2 Wrote: Jan 28, 2013 12:09 AM

The pressuring of banks to have no dealings with arms or ammunition of any kind, is working, it seems. A friend thought to buy her husband some ammunition for his gun, so he could go to the shooting range, but when she got to the check-out, her debit card was denied. After 3 tries, she called the place...Bank of America...they informed her that they no longer could support anything to do with gun, arms or ammunition. Now, understand people this was HER money, NOT theirs, but they were intent on restricting her use of HER money, to buy ammunition. She and her husband are in the process of transferring their home mortgage, checking, etc, from BOA to any other bank at all. And I guarantee I won't be using BOA at all. EVER!

Join the Debate!

All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.

Read Full Story

Why Republicans Are Poised To Lose The Second Amendment Battle

You have to give progressives credit. They’re nothing if not thorough. When an opportunity to limit the Second Amendment presented itself in the Sandy Hook massacre, regardless how tasteless it was to exploit that opportunity, they went full bore toward their goal.

Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., introduced sweeping so-called “assault weapons” ban legislation this week that would place unprecedented restrictions on individuals’ rights to own, use, sell and even pass along already owned firearms to family members. But given where things stand now in the polls and political atmosphere, that legislation will go nowhere.

But the Constitution and the...

Related Tags: Rahm Emanuel Guns Republicans Dianne Feinstein Barack Obama Second Amendment Sandy Hook