In response to:

Right-to-Work Laws Shouldn’t Exist, so Why Am I Happy about What Happened in Michigan?

ksatifka Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 5:19 PM
Brave, Daniel! I don't usually read most Townhall writers as most seem to have pretty much the same ideas, but I was intrigued by the title of your essay. I knew that I hated the Mich right-to-work (for less) act, but you have made the case in an unusual way. Some companies (maybe GM and some other huge corps) may want to remain union shops, and that should be their right. Unions do sometimes help enforce discipline and they definitely reduce turnover, which is the bane of many employers. However, after you brilliantly stated your libertarian case for keeping the gov't out, you contradicted yourself by then saying you were glad that Mich passed the new law.