Spot on. They know what the truth is, but in Liberal Land the ends always justify the means. And the ends in this case are "the first Black president" and "the first woman president." Nothing else matters.

Come now, like a battered spouse the press knows that deep down Obama really loves them. The One will toss them a little bone and the slobbering love affair of Obama's lapdogs in the press will continue.

In what language does Associated Press (AP) mean "water-carriers for Clinton-Obama"?

I concur with Obama being a lying scoundrel, but I take exception to your swipes at Romney. By all accounts Mitt Romney is a good and honorable man with a proven track record in the business world – or are we looking for someone who can simply out-con the con artists on the left? Do you feel we can out-Hollywood the Hollywood-DC-Manhattan axis? In the end Obama survived re-election because too many Americans are too impressed with style over substance. Don’t blame Romney for being a decent, capable man in a nation so corrupt as to stand behind someone like Obama.

Maybe they won't have a choice -- the gravy train is going bankrupt.

Spot on. The person who said something like that would have been savaged on all the talk shows.

Have you by chance figured in the cost of medical education, and how much of that is paid for by the government?

Perhaps he thought such a vote would poison the water against ANY Dem in Montana in 2014.

There are a lot of working-class people in Montana and other states who are real -- that is to say, freedom-loving -- Americans, but they are steadfastly in denial about what the Dems have become. The coastal and urban liberals hold such farming and ranching types in utmost contempt, of course, but still rely upon them to elect people like the former Senator from Montana.

From the back of what cereal box did you get this maxim? There are many religious people who would claim proof of God that the athiest would not accept and many athiests who would claim they have disproved the existance of God in ways the religious people would not accept. You can "prove" or "disprove" most anything if you get to decide what the rules of evidence are.