In response to:

Will Democrats End Marriage As We Know It?

Kizarvexious Wrote: Aug 01, 2012 12:56 PM
Equal rights for all! To quote Thomas Jefferson "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."
Jay Wye Wrote: Aug 01, 2012 7:19 PM
Homos already HAVE -equal- right to marriage;
they can marry another person of the opposite sex the same as any other person.
That IS the definition of "marriage";man-woman,it's been that way for several thousand years.

This is all about the REDEFINITION of "marriage" to be something it's never been,and thus FORCING other states to recognize the abomination via Article IV,sec 1.
Homos are seeking SPECIAL rights and the reordering of US society to suit their agenda and mental illness.
wmou Wrote: Aug 01, 2012 1:16 PM
If it is equality you want, why do advocates for same-sex marriage exclude those who want to live together without being married?
Bill1895 Wrote: Aug 01, 2012 1:04 PM
Currently homosexuals have the same Constitutional Rights as hetrosexuals.

Jefferson was not at the US Constitutional Convention
Anominus Wrote: Aug 01, 2012 1:02 PM
What currently existing rights are you currently lack?
Bill1895 Wrote: Aug 01, 2012 1:05 PM
Reading the US Constitution, it is clear that homosexuals are not lacking any.
Anominus Wrote: Aug 01, 2012 1:09 PM

When the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) passed in Congress in 1996, the vote was bi-partisan and overwhelming. In the House, the tally was 342-67. Only the farthest left of Democrats and a handful of Republicans voted against it. A majority of Democrats supported marriage. In the Senate, the vote was even more lopsided and bi-partisan, 85-14. Again, most Democrats backed marriage. In both houses of Congress, the DOMA passed with such strong margins that President Clinton could clearly see the measure had better than "veto strength." That is, if he had vetoed the Defense of Marriage Act, Congress could have...