In response to:

Norquist to King: “I Hope his Wife Understands That Commitments Last a Little Longer Than Two years”

Kizarvexious Wrote: Nov 27, 2012 11:47 AM
I prefer to make pledges to protect the Constitution, not some ideologue and has rabid anti-revenue schemes. Shame on all the GOP who would rather honour a pledge to this fool than their pledge to the country for which they serve.
James____Tx Wrote: Nov 27, 2012 11:48 AM
nodeamass does a better job of delivering it's talking points.
Kizarvexious Wrote: Nov 27, 2012 11:56 AM
So where exactly do you put a pledge to Grover in relation to the Constitution and country? Your such an ideologue that Grover is probably the most important to you.
James____Tx Wrote: Nov 27, 2012 11:59 AM
You don't have a clue what is important to me.

James____Tx Wrote: Nov 27, 2012 12:05 PM
Like I said

nodeamass does a better job of delivering it's talking points.

Quite rightly, Americans for Tax Reform’s Grover Norquist is lashing out at congressional Republicans -- especially Rep. Peter King (R-NY) -- for trying to “weasel” out of the anti-tax pledge they had previously signed but now (surprise!) no longer want to uphold:

Anti-tax hike crusader Grover Norquist is slamming Rep. Peter King, saying he hoped “his wife understands that commitments last a little longer than two years” after the New York lawmaker said the no-taxes pledge is binding for only one session of Congress.

“The pledge is not for life, but everybody who signed the pledge including Peter King,...