1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Chris Christie Won't Be At CPAC

Kirkie17 Wrote: Feb 26, 2013 1:26 PM
The GOP would be stupid to completely disregard Christie; especially as a 2016 presidential nominee. Christie is an unapologetic conservative, he is just not as scary about it. If Christie was to be the nominee in 2016, then Delaware, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania will be in play. Furthermore, the mainstream media will not attack him in the same manner in which they did Romney. It would be a huge mistake for conservatives to turn their back on Christie- it could cost 'em the White House.
In response to:

Swing States: Romney 51, Obama 46

Kirkie17 Wrote: Oct 16, 2012 1:36 PM
Well Rasmussen has Obama leading by 2 percentage points in their Swing State analysis.
How are those poll numbers looking in Ohio, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Nevada?
Apparently, you have no clue about treason.
Why would a liberal say something? You can show your ID if you want to. The beautiful part is: I don't have to show mine...lol.
The Judge made the right decision is reversing the Voter ID Law.
I couldn't have said it any better myself.
Lol..good comeback. It's not going to happen that way, but good comeback nonetheless.
Lol...believe what you want to believe. Go back to grammar school, and learn how to write a coherent thought.
We are not citizens of third world country, though. What economic plan has Romney/Ryan come up with? They speak in very general terms about what they would do in a Romney Presidency, and they refuse to give specifics. Obama was very specific about his economic plan in '08, and he succeeded in passing his agenda. Romney has no clear agenda, yet he expects people to vote for him.
1 - 10 Next
Sunday, May 19 | 02:36 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 02:36 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 02:36 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 02:36 PM ET