Democrats appear to have the upper hand on the politics of the fiscal cliff, which might explain their brash pronouncements and mind-blowing conceptualization of "compromise." This morning I outlined three possible contingencies for Republicans, none of which is especially attractive. But is there a fourth way? The GOP's dilemma is a doozy. Their opponents, emboldened by the election, are pushing for counter-productive tax hikes on "the rich" -- a politically popular...
Obama’s word is no good; he promised to close Gitmo, cut the deficit in half, ‘Dream Act’. If he’ll lie to his own, he’ll shellac the Reps and isn't trustworthy to ‘deal’ with here. Take the Fiscal Cliff with Sequestration cuts to spending and tax hikes limited to Clinton era rates and no more which Obama wants. $900 billion in cuts with half to DOD is livable. The Pentagon can close little needed bases in Japan, Kosovo, Germany, the UK, elsewhere and do just fine. No matter what the Reps agree to, the Dems will blame them for whatever comes in the next 4 years. Obama won't accept Simpson-Bowles. Take the Fiscal Cliff option; it’s ugly, but it’s the best deal the Reps will ever get in the next 4 years. ___‹~›__‹(•¿•)›__‹~›___
- The border crisis isn’t Obama’s Katrina – it’s worse Noah Rothman 22 minutes ago
- Uh oh: Moscow claims Ukraine attack inside Russian territory killed civilians Noah Rothman 1 hour ago
- The Lerner Files: “smidgens upon smidgens” of corruption Jazz Shaw 3 hours ago
- Afghan interpreters who aided US in danger of being left behind Jazz Shaw 4 hours ago
- Sunday reflection: Matthew 13:1–23 Ed Morrissey 5 hours ago
- ICE has the chance to catch Jose Antonio Vargas RIGHT NOW Jazz Shaw 6 hours ago