Democrats appear to have the upper hand on the politics of the fiscal cliff, which might explain their brash pronouncements and mind-blowing conceptualization of "compromise." This morning I outlined three possible contingencies for Republicans, none of which is especially attractive. But is there a fourth way? The GOP's dilemma is a doozy. Their opponents, emboldened by the election, are pushing for counter-productive tax hikes on "the rich" -- a politically popular...
Obama’s word is no good; he promised to close Gitmo, cut the deficit in half, ‘Dream Act’. If he’ll lie to his own, he’ll shellac the Reps and isn't trustworthy to ‘deal’ with here. Take the Fiscal Cliff with Sequestration cuts to spending and tax hikes limited to Clinton era rates and no more which Obama wants. $900 billion in cuts with half to DOD is livable. The Pentagon can close little needed bases in Japan, Kosovo, Germany, the UK, elsewhere and do just fine. No matter what the Reps agree to, the Dems will blame them for whatever comes in the next 4 years. Obama won't accept Simpson-Bowles. Take the Fiscal Cliff option; it’s ugly, but it’s the best deal the Reps will ever get in the next 4 years. ___‹~›__‹(•¿•)›__‹~›___
- NYT poll: 65% of whites, 80% of blacks say police shouldn’t have military-style weapons Allahpundit 47 mins ago
- In effort to shield Obama from criticism on ISIS, White House makes everything worse Noah Rothman 1 hour ago
- Video: Mitt Romney takes the ALS Ice Bucket challenge Allahpundit 2 hours ago
- A Christian conundrum in conservative rhetoric? Ed Morrissey 2 hours ago
- Sanitizing terror: Has the press distorted Islamic radical’s crusade against gay men? Noah Rothman 3 hours ago
- Family friend tells WaPo: Yes, Darren Wilson did suffer an eye socket fracture Allahpundit 4 hours ago