If anyone doesn't know who their Rep is. go here: http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/ ___‹~›__‹(•¿•)›__‹~›___

Write your Congressman NOW and let em know you don’t like this bill and they ought vote NO and take the Sequestration. Take Obama’s checkbook away…it’s the spending stupid. Find your Congressperson here: http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/ ___‹~›__‹(•¿•)›__‹~›___

This bill is a tax increase with NO spending cuts. It’s $60 billion a year in new tax revenue without regard to outta control spending. What kinda "balance" or deal is that? Reps get nothing voting for this bill but more blame. House Reps ought vote ‘No’ if they’ve any spine or vote ‘PRESENT’ at the least and demand a new bill with serious spending cuts or no deal. Take the Sequestration and checkbook from the left…they’ll never concede spending cuts otherwise. Call, e-mail and contact your Representative to vote ‘NO’ on this or let them know they'll face your lost voter support in their next cycle. ___‹~›__‹(•¿•)›__‹~›___

Reps in the House ought just call in sick with "stomach flu and related concussions." Then with no House to take a vote, let the Sequestration begin. Obama voted for sequestration in lieu of no deal back in July of '11..we got no deal this would be the Obama tax increases on the middle class. And since those Clinton years and tax rates were so good we've been told, they ought be good nuf for 2013 for EVERYONE. ___‹~›__‹(•¿•)›__‹~›___

SOS Clinton comes back next week. And if she ever testifies abput BenghaziGate, ya think she’ll claim to “not recall” any questions which may stain her 2016 blue dress or…will she invoke amnesia ‘scuses caused by her alleged concussion? ___‹~›__‹(•¿•)›__‹~›___

Obama’s word is no good; he promised to close Gitmo, cut the deficit in half, ‘Dream Act’. If he’ll lie to his own, he’ll shellac the Reps and isn't trustworthy to ‘deal’ with here. Take the Fiscal Cliff with Sequestration cuts to spending and tax hikes limited to Clinton era rates and no more which Obama wants. $900 billion in cuts with half to DOD is livable. The Pentagon can close little needed bases in Japan, Kosovo, Germany, the UK, elsewhere and do just fine. No matter what the Reps agree to, the Dems will blame them for whatever comes in the next 4 years. Obama won't accept Simpson-Bowles. Take the Fiscal Cliff option; it’s ugly, but it’s the best deal the Reps will ever get in the next 4 years. ___‹~›__‹(•¿•)›__‹~›___

Obama's greatest fear is no deal in his favor and taxes going up on everyone. But we've been told over and over that the Clinton tax rates were allegedly why BJ Clinton enjoyed such a good economy. M'kay...let's go back to those BJ era rates on EVERYONE and force the $900 billion in real spending cuts. This is far better than anything Obama will offer. It's a deal Obama already agreed to (Sequestration) and time to call his bluff. Take the FISCAL CLIFF...it's the best deal the Reps can get and doesn't cave to Obama. ___‹~›__‹(•¿•)›__‹~›___

Sequestration (AKA the "fiscal cliff") is not a bad deal. Obama will NEVER agree to meaningful cuts and is really only seeking to play partisan politics of class envy. Obama isn't serious about any 'balanced approach'...he's in campaign mode still. Screw em...take the cliff, hold Obama spending to no more than Sequestration and tax increases no more than Clinton rates on EVERYONE. ___‹~›__‹(•¿•)›__‹~›___

'Kilroy Was Here' ___‹~›__‹(•¿•)›__‹~›___

It isn't a tax cut. It's a successful campaign slogan that worked in November on the idiot 47% and continues to work.

The Mack-Penny plan works today...but the left rejected it along with their own Simpson-Bowles commission. That's why Sequestration works today...it cuts govt. spending in real terms while only increasing taxes to Clinton rates which are far lower than the rates Obama wants. Take the FISCAL CLIFF...it's as good a deal as we'll get.