In response to:

Democrats Lock Up Uterus Vote

Kiffur Wrote: Sep 16, 2012 7:08 PM
...thing when in reality it said the exact opposite. So how about a max of 10 pages per section of each piece of legislation but under no circumstances any more than 100 pages per bill? Next, under #5: I would guess you’d include shale oil and natural gas development, but would you also be interested in allowing the free market to see if solar and wind and other “green” plans can ever be truly sustainable and marketable? As for #6, do we really want to simply shrink the EPA; can’t we return this department completely to the states? ...
Kiffur Wrote: Sep 16, 2012 7:08 PM
... Finally, #7: do we REALLY need a Federal Reserve at all? Transparent or not what does it do for this country? (Remember, one of my only C’s – screwed up my GPA, it did! – was in economics, so I’d really like to know.) Meanwhile, please keep up making a very difficult subject much more accessible.

Longball38884 wrote: Won't it be great when the department of pregnancy can tie down every woman and force her to have her monthly ultra sound to PROVE she's not even thinking of having an abortion? -Another Excuse from Both Ways Barack

Dear Comrade Oddball,

There is only one party dumb enough to start a Department of Pregnancy and it’s not the GOP. 

How exactly would an “ultrasound” prove what a woman is thinking? Like most liberals, I think you are confused a bit by a woman’s biology. That part doesn’t do...