1 - 10 Next
"Can anyone tell me the "CORRECT" temperature for the earth?" No, no one can . The best that can be done is to estimate the world wide average temperature from discrete measurements made around the world and then computing the average based on them. This is a statistical estimate which can never be 100% accurate. Further the selection of the points at which the temperatures are taken certainly introduces a bias.
"No matter what name they hang on it in order to disguise their true intent, it's always been about power and money and getting as much of both as possible." And no matter whether warming, cooling, climate change, etc. the culprit is always the same, CO2. If CO2 causes warming, it cannot cause cooling. True cause effect relationships must always have the same effect for the same change in the causative factor. This alone puts shows that the climate change crowd's "science" is bogus.
"I analyzed the ObamaCare law and 189 times it basically said the HHS Secretary (who reports to Obama) could 'change' the ObamaCare (rules and regulations) any time after the first of each Year - for any reason - WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION from Congress." Yes, but if Obama's HHS Secretary can make such changes, so can the next Republican President's HHS Secretary.
Gruber told the truth in January 2012 which shows that the intent of the law was to put pressure on the states to set up exchanges. Now that that has blown up in his and other ACA supporters faces he is changing his story and lying. Typical liberal behavior.
The stock market is being inflated by investors because of low interest rates. Investors will accept lower yields from stocks when there is no better option available.
It was the DC Circuit not the Fourth that ruled in favor of the plain text. The Fourth Circuit held that the subsidies apply to all states whether or not the state operates the exchange. If the DC Circuit decision prevails, look for another challenge based on the equal protection clause. If the Fourth Circuit prevails, laws mean nothing except what courts say, not what the laws say.
In response to:

Killing Marine Life with Ethanol

Kibitzer Wrote: Jul 21, 2014 2:19 PM
The 10% ethanol fuel is 90% gasoline, and the 10% ethanol does produce energy as well, so the fuel economy isn't reduced by 10%. If the fuel economy fell by 10% with 10% ethanol, the ethanol would not be providing any energy.
In response to:

Killing Marine Life with Ethanol

Kibitzer Wrote: Jul 21, 2014 2:12 PM
So you engaged in a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
In response to:

Impeach Eric Holder Now

Kibitzer Wrote: Jul 21, 2014 2:05 PM
" The House of Representatives has voted to hold Lerner in contempt. The next vote they schedule should be to impeach Eric Holder. ... ... It is time for the worst Attorney General in our history to be removed from office. The only way that can occur is for Congress to act and act now. " While Holder clearly is a racist and deserves to be impeached and removed from office for his malfeasance, it will not happen for the same reasons that Barack Obama will not be impeached and removed from office. The primary reason being Harry Reid and Senate Democrats.
In response to:

Killing Marine Life with Ethanol

Kibitzer Wrote: Jul 19, 2014 1:15 PM
" Across its life cycle, ethanol production and use also releases more carbon dioxide per gallon than gasoline." This statement is not true; however, because of the lower energy content of a gallon of ethanol as compared to gasoline there is no reduction in the amount of CO2 released per mile driven. It take about 1 1/2 gallons of ethanol to produce the same amount of energy as a gallon of gasoline. Ethanol is an environmental hoax.
1 - 10 Next