In response to:

Petraeus: We Knew Benghazi Was Terrorism "Almost Immediately"

kgrammer Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 12:50 PM
I heard the exchange between Obama and the press corpse (pun intended) and could not believe that there was no follow-up question about why the WH sent Ambassador Rice out with the administration's talking points if Ambassador Rice had nothing to do with Benghazi. This president is truly scary. His "faux indignation" was so convincing as to leave the press corpse agog. Obama has put on these performances for 4 years and yet the only one who's skillfully analyzed his pathology is Harvard trained psychiatrist, Dr. Charles Krauthammer.

CNN landed the scoop regarding what former CIA Director and four star general David Petraeus is telling members of Congress behind closed doors today:
 

CNN reports that former Central Intelligence Agency director David H. Petraeus wants to tell Congress that he knew “almost immediately” that the attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi was perpetrated by terrorists. According to the source, reports attributing the attack to protests surrounding an anti-Islam video and protests in Cairo were not disproven until after Petraeus made his initial report to Congress. Despite that, according to CNN, Petraeus had separate talking points from Rice’s...